✦ Kerala High Court

BY AD v. BINOY VASUDEVAN

A DESAI V G ARUN, GOVERNMENT2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. When the appeal is called out for hearing, Adv. Sadchith P.Kurup, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent / original petitioner, states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition itself, which is listed today before the learned Single Judge. In view of the…

Judgment

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 26TH POUSHA, 1945 WA NO. 68 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 32102/2023 DATED 19.12.2023 OF HIGH APPELLANT(S)/9TH RESPONDENT: COURT OF KERALA CHAVAKKAD BAR ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, COURT COMPLEX, CHAVAKKAD, SIJU MUTTATH, S/O. M.J.LAZAR, AGED 48 YEARS, MUTTATH HOUSE, KOTTAPADY (PO), GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680505, IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 05/01/2024 IN IA NO.1/2023 IN WP(C) NO.32102/2023., PIN - 680505 BY ADVS. BINOY VASUDEVAN RINCY KHADER SREEJITH SREENATH RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 8 AND 10: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 C.B. RAJEEV AGED 42 YEARS S/O. BHASKARAN, ADVOCATE CHOONDAPURACKAL KANIPAYYOOR THRISSUR, PIN - 680517 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW & JUSTICE GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME (C ) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 THE REGISTRAR DISTRICT JUDICIARY HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 THE REGISTRAR (GENERAL) HIGH COURT OFKERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 THE REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) WA NO. 68 OF 2024 -2- 8 9 10 HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 THE CHIEFENGINEER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 ADDL. R10 - ADV. PRAMJI PAUL VAZHAPPILLY, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O PAUL, OPPOSITE KUNNAMKULAM COURT COMPLEX, KUNNAMKULAM PO, KAKKAD, THRISSUR- 680503, IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 05/01/2024 IN IA NO.2/2023 IN WP(C) NO.32102/2023., PIN - 695033 SR.ADV.T.KRISHNANUNNI ADV. SADCHITH P. KURUP FOR R1; ADV.B.G.HARINDRANATH FOR R5 TO R8; SR.GP. K.P.HARISH THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

16.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WA NO. 68 OF 2024 -3- JUDGMENT A.J.DESAI, CJ. By way of the present appeal filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, the original respondent has challenged the interim order dated 19.12.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge in the captioned Writ Petition (C) No. 32102/2023.

Operative part

2.

When the appeal is called out for hearing, Adv. Sadchith P.Kurup, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent / original petitioner, states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition itself, which is listed today before the learned Single Judge. In view of the above statement made at the Bar, the present appeal would not survive. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- A.J.DESAI CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE 16.01.2024 WA NO. 68 OF 2024 -4- APPENDIX OF WA 68/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM NO.D7(B)-57565/2014/DII-3/DII-4 DATED 09.01.2024 DIRECTING THE DISTRICT JUDGE, THRISSUR TO IMPLEMENT THE DECISION OF THE JUDGE IN CHARGE DATED 20.12.2023 OF THIS HON,BLE COURT

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments