BAIL APPL No. 3045 of 2007 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 May 2007
- Bench
- V RAMKUMAR
Outcome
Allowed
This application is allowed as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 109, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 452
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 27
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but from afuture date.…
- Para 44. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.mrcs B.A.No.3045/20073
Judgment
V.RAMKUMAR, J.----------------------------Bail Application No. 3045/2007-----------------------------Dated this 25th day of May, 2007
O R D E RThe petitioner who is the fifth accused in CrimeNo.47/2007 of Tanur Police Station for offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 307, 109 and120B IPC read with Section 149 IPC and also under Section27 of the Arms Act, 1959, seeks his enlargement on bail. Theoccurrence took place on 24.1.2007 at about 6.30 a.m. Thepetitioner was arrested on 7.5.2007.
I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but from afuture date. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 11.6.2007, on his executinga bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-I, Parappanangadi and subject to the following conditions: B.A.No.3045/20072(a).The petitioner shall report before the C.I of Police, Tanur, between 9 am.and 11 am. on all Wednesdays. (b). The petitioner shall not enter the limits of Tanur police station until further orders except for the purpose of complying condition No. (a)(c).The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. (d).The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
Operative part
If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.mrcs B.A.No.3045/20073
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application is allowed as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 109, 120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 452; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 25 May 2007. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.