Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Apr 2007
- Bench
- V RAMKUMAR
Outcome
Disposed of
The application is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 427, 447, 452
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 27
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate having jurisdiction and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 2208 of 2007() ----------------------------- (CRIME No.80/2007 OF POOJAPPURA POLICE STATION) --------------------------- PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- BABILU SANKARA AGED 31,S/O.LATE SANKARNKUTTY NAIR,PRANAVAM,VATTAVILA,VPS-25, THIRUMALA P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-6. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: -----------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,POOJAPPURA POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- Bail Application No. 2208/2007 ----------------------------- Dated this 12th day of April, 2007
O R D E R The petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.80/2007 of Poojappura police station originally registered for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 427 and 324 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and subsequently registered for an offence punishable under Section 452 IPC and also under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.
Operative part
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate having jurisdiction and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it is filed. The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 427, 447, 452; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 12 Apr 2007. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.