BAIL APPL No. 2119 of 2008 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In the result, this application is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
B.A. No. 2119 of 2008 -: 3 :-necessary. Every court must do the same. Sufficient general directions on this aspect have already been issued in the decision reported in Alice George v. Deputy Superintendent of Police(2003 (1) KLT 339).5. In the result, this application is dismissed; but with the observation that if the petitioner surrenders before the learnedMagistrate and seeks bail, after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistratemust proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously – on the date of surrender itself. Sd/- (R. BASANT, JUDGE)Nan/ //true copy//P.S. to Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, this application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 31 Mar 2008. The bench was R BASANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.