✦ Kerala High Court · 04 Apr 2007

BAIL APPL No. 2137 of 2007 · Kerala High Court

BAIL APPL No. 2137 of 2007V RAMKUMAR

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Apr 2007
Bench
V RAMKUMAR

Outcome

Allowed

The application is allowed as above

Provisions considered

Judgment

V.RAMKUMAR, J.----------------------------Bail Application No. 2137/2007-----------------------------Dated this 4th day of April, 2007

Operative part

O R D E RIn this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.168/2007 of Panangad Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 3 read with Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959,seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on20.3.20072.I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. The case of the prosecution is that at about 7.15 p.m,on 20.3.2007, the accused was found in possession of an unlicensed revolver by the police party, who happened to stumble upon the petitioner during the law and order patrol. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the present stage of the investigation, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner only from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from13.4.2007, on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like B.A.2137/20072amount to the satisfaction of the Additional C.J.M, Ernakulamand subject to the following conditions: (a).The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 am. and 11am. on all Wednesdays. (b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report. (c).The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. (d).The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above.V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGEmrcs B.A.2137/20073

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed as above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Arms Act, 1959 — ss. 3, 25(1)(a).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 04 Apr 2007. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BAIL APPL No. 2137 of 2007). ← Search more judgments