BAIL APPL No. 1878 of 2012 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.------------------------------------------BA NO. 1878 OF 2012------------------------------------------Dated this the 28th day of March, 2012
O R D E RApprehending arrest in Crime No:1244/2011 of Irinjalakuda Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 465 and 468 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code, based on a private complaint filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Irinjalakuda, by the BranchManager of Union Bank of India, Irinjalakuda, petition is filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitionersearlier filed BA No:7328/2011, which was dismissed by Annexure-A1 order dated 15.11.2011, finding that petitioners did not plead any apprehension of arrest.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor were heard.
Learned Public Prosecutor made available the CaseDiary.
On perusing the Case Diary, I do not find that custodial interrogation is necessary. In such circumstances, petitioners are directed to report before the Investigating Officer BA NO. 1878 OF 2012..2..with seven days from today for interrogation. After completing the interrogation, petitioners shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only)each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer on the following conditions. 1. The petitioners shall report before the InvestigatingOfficer on every Saturday between 10 and 12 am for one month and thereafter, as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 2. Petitioners shall not induce, threaten or intimidate any person from disclosing facts known to him to the Investigating Officer or to the Court. 3. Petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the concerned Magistrate. 4. If petitioners fail to report before the InvestigatingOfficer as directed, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to arrest them. Sd/-M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGEbka/-//True copy//PA to Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.