Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal is dismissed as settled out of court
Judgment
GOLDEN FINANCE, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, P.M.GEORGE, S/O.PERINGAYIL MATHUNNY, KIZHAKKEKOTTA ANGADY, THRISSUR.
C.J.PALU, S/O.CHIRIYANKANDATH JOSEPH. MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR. (DIED) C.D.ANTHONY, S/O.CHALISSERY DEVASSY, VELIYANNUR DESOM, THRISSUR. ADDL.
MRS.CHINNAMMA PALU.C.J. AGED 73 YEARS W/O.LATE C.J.PALU, CHIRIANKANDATH HOUSE, PIPE LINE ROAD, MYLIPADAM, THRISSUR - 5.
MR.C.P.JOSE, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.LATE C.J.PALU, CHIRIANKANDATH HOUSE, PIPE LANE ROAD, MYLIPADAM THRISSUR. MR.C.P.BABU, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.LATE C.J.PALU, CHIRIANKANDATH HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR 1. MRS.DARLEY MONCEY, AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.LATE C.J.PALU, PULIKOTTIL HOUSE, KOTTAPPADAI P.O., VIA KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. MRS. JOLLY JOHN, AGED 47 YEARS, D/O.C.J.PALU, NADAKKARUKARAN HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR -1. AS NO.524/1991/C -2-
MRS.MOLLY THOMAS, D/O.C.J.PALU, AGED 44 YEARS, CHIRIANKANDATH HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR 1. (ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 4 TO 9 IMPLEADED AS LR'S OF DECEASED 2ND APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 10.1.07 IN I.A.1801/05) BY ADV. SRI.K.ARAVINDAKSHA MENON SRI.P.P.JNANASEKHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. MATHIRI, W/O.OVUNGAL SALAMON, LOURDHPURAM, THRISSUR TOWN, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
9. P.V.ITTIACHAN, S/O.PALATHINKAL VARKEY, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM, CHEMBOOKKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. C.J.GEORGE, S/O.CHIRIYANKANDATHU JOSEPH, MALLIPADAM DESOM, CHEMBOOKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. C.J.BABY, S/O.CHIRIYANKANDATH, JOSEPH, KIZHAKKEKKOTTA DESOM, THRISSUR VILLAGE AND TALUK. M.D.LONAPPAN, S/O.MUTTICHOOKKARAN DEVASSY, PATHIMA NAGAR, THRISSUR VILLAGE AND TALUK. C.P.JOSE, S/O.CHANDY PALU, ERINJERY ANGADY, THRISSUR TOWN. P.J.RAPHEAL, S/O.PALLIPURATHUKARAN JOSEPH, KURIYACHIRA DESOM, THRISSUR TOWN. T.F.PAUL, S/O.THARAKAN, FRANCIS, CHOOLPURAM DESOM, IRINGAPRAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. K.A.KOCHUPAULY, S/O.KUTTICHAKKU AUGUSTI, KIZHAKKECHALAKUDY, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
C.P.MATHEW, S/O.CHIRAKKAKKARAN PYLOTH, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR. AS NO.524/1991/C -3-
M.L.ROBY, S/O.MUTTICHOOKKARAN, LONAPPAN, CHEMBOOKKAVU, THRISSUR TALUK AND DISTRICT. P.M.GEORGE, S/O.PERINGAYIL, MATHUNNY, KIZHAKKE ANGADY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. C.C.ANTONY, S/O.CHEMMANNUR CHAKKU, KORAPPATH LANE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. THANKAMMA, D/O.LATE OLLUKKARAN JOSEPH, MISSION QUARTERS, THRISSUR. MOHAN, S/O.LATE OLLUKKARAN JOSEPH. DO.......DO. JOSE, S/O.LATE OLLUKKARAN JOSEPH, DO......DO. JOHNY, S/O.LATE OLLUKKARAN JOSEPH, DO.....DO. SALEENA, S/O.LATE ELUVATHINKAL LOUVIS, KANNAMKULANGARA, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SEENA, D/O.LATE ELUVATHINKAL LOUVIS, DO........DO. LIYO, S/O.LATE ELUVATHINKAL LOUVIS, DO.......DO. BY SRI.P.SHRIHARI SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD SRI.N.NARENDRANATH THIS APPEAL SUIT HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALATH AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT: AS NO.524/1991/C -4- I.A. NO.3714/2006 IN A.S.NO.524/1991 PETITIONER CAN MOVE COURT. V.BHASKARAN NAMBIAR (RETD.JUDGE) SD/-
Operative part
24.1.2007 T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN (RETD.JUDGE) SD/- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE V.BHASKARAN NAMBIAR (RETD. JUDGE) & T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN (RETD. JUDGE) A.S. No. 524 OF 1991(C) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2007 A W A R D The appellant and the counsel on both sides submit that the matter has been settled out of court. Appeal is dismissed as settled out of court. The petitioner can apply for refund of court fee allowable by law and for return of documents. V.BHASKARAN NAMBIAR (RETD. JUDGE) T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN (RETD. JUDGE)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed as settled out of court
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 24 Jan 2007. The bench was V BHASKARAN NAMBIAR, T V RAMAKRISHNAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.