✦ Kerala High Court

THE ANDOORKORNAM KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARNA SANGHOM v. STATE OF KERALA

GOPINATH P4 min read

Case at a glance

Judgment

STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 THE DIRECTOR OF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER POTHENCODE POLICE STATION POTHENCODE - ANDOORKONAM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695584 THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CO-BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 RETURNING OFFICER THE ANDOORKORNAM KSHEEROLPADAKA SAHAKARNA SANGHOM T.122(D) APCOS UNIT DAIRY FARM INSPECTOR BLOCK A, DAIRY EXTENSION SERVICE UNIT, POTHENCODE BLOCK PANCHAYATH OFFICE, KAZHAKKOOTTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695584 M. SUDHEER S/O MASTANKUNJU SUDHEER MANZIL, VELLOOR, ANDOORKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695584 SMT. C.S. SHEEJA, SR. GP SRI. C.M. NAZAR, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

05.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 213 OF 2024 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Co-operative Society registered and functioning under the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The election to the Managing Committee of the Society is scheduled to be held on 10.01.2024. Apprehending disorderly conduct by anti-social elements, the petitioner is stated to have submitted Exts.P4, P5 and P7 requests seeking police protection so as to hold a free and fair election. Complaining of inaction, the petitioner is before this Court seeking the following reliefs:. i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction commanding Respondents 3 and 4 to afford sufficient police protection during the polling of the election to the managing committee of petitioner society, scheduled on 10.01.2024 and to continue that protection till results are declared; ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, directing respondent 5 and 6 to videograph the entire polling process on 10.01.2024 or in the alternative, permit the petitioner to arrange for videography of the entire election proceedings at its expense of the premises where election is conducted.

2.

I have heard Adv. N Anand, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Adv. C.M. Nazar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 and Adv. C.S. Sheeja, the learned Senior Government Pleader. WP(C) NO. 213 OF 2024 3

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions made across the bar, this writ petition is ordered by issuing the following directions. (i) There will be a direction to the 4th respondent to ensure smooth conduct of the election to the Managing Committee of the petitioner society to be held on 10.01.2024 in terms of the Circular dated

20.11.2013 issued by the State Police Chief. (ii) There will be a direction to respondents 5 and 6 to consider the request of the petitioner to videograph the process of election, and the petitioner shall be granted permission to videograph the process of election at its own expense. Such videography shall be under the supervision of the 6th respondent and shall be carried out without causing any manner of disturbance to the voters and officials and without causing any interference with the balloting done in the polling booths. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE WP(C) NO. 213 OF 2024 4 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 Exhibit P5 Exhibit P6 Exhibit P7 Exhibit P8 Exhibit P9 Exhibit P10 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 213/2024 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.10.2013 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P(C) NO. 24603 OF 2013 A TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO. 28/2013 ISSUED BY THE STATE POLICE CHIEF DATED 20.11.2013 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.11.2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 5 IN NO.E(2)7222/2023/ S.C.E.C A TRUE COPY OF THE UNDATED REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE RESPONDENT NO. 6 A TRUE COPY OF UNDATED COMPLAINT MADE BY PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO. 3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 21.12.2023 A TRUE COPY OF UNDATED COMPLAINT DATED 27.12.2023 MADE BY PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO. 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTIONS NO. 1 OF THE PETITIONER SOCIETY DATED 27.12.2023 A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTIONS NO. 3 OF THE PETITIONER SOCIETY DATED 27.12.2023 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.09.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments