KOROTH MAVILA VIJAYAN v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
contentions, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, reserving the right to raise the contentions in the pending suit between the parties. He requests that all contentions raised by the petitioner in this writ petition be left open. Leaving open the right of the petitioner to raise all contentions, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sru Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE WP(C) NO. 193 OF 2024 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 193/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P 1 Exhibit P 2 Exhibit P 3 Exhibit P 4 Exhibit P 5 COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 17.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOODALI IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 16.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. SITE CUM SERVICE PLAN APPROVED ALONG WITH THE PERMIT. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 12.12.2023 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN DATED 14.11.2023 WITH PERMIT NO. A 3-BA ( 377943)/2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R5(a) The true copy of the road registration of Ward No. 10 of the Koodali panchayath.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.