Judgment · High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 02 Jun 2009
- Bench
- K T SANKARAN
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 312, 376
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. I have gone through the case diary. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence involved and the allegations made against the petitioner, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to get anticipatory bail. The…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4 of 2009() -------------------------- CRIME NO.287 OF 2008 OF UPPUTHARA POLICE STATION PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED -------------------- SANTHOSH.K.R. S/O.RAJAN, 24 YEARS, KARIMATTOM HOUSE, UPPUTHARA. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM(CRIME NO.287/2008 OF UPPUTHARA POLICE STATION) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------- B.A.No.4 of 2009 ---------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2009 ORDER This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.287 of 2008 of Upputhara Police Station.
The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 376 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code.
I have gone through the case diary. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offence involved and the allegations made against the petitioner, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to get anticipatory bail. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE BA No. /2009 2 BA No. /2009 3 K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 312, 376.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 02 Jun 2009. The bench was K T SANKARAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.