AR No. 57 of 2010 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
A.R. No.57/20102over to the respondent on 05.04.2007. Annexure A5 onwardsare the communications in the matter and the total claim goingby Annexure A10 is Rs.8,58,293/- which according to them is anoutstanding amount. 4. Heard the parties. Since the dispute will have to beadjudicated by recourse to the remedy by way of arbitrationprovided under clause 3 of the agreement Annexure A1, requestof the applicant is allowed. I appoint Sri.A.Haridasan, DistrictJudge (Retd), Plot 237, Hill Garden Housing Colony, Kuttanellur, Trichur-14 as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputebetween the applicant and the respondent. The Arbitrator will befree to fix the remuneration and other expenses for arbitration. Registry will communicate the order to the sole Arbitratorappointed and the parties will appear pursuant to the directionsissued by the Arbitrator. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJUDGEsmp
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.