✦ Kerala High Court · 09 Jun 2009

SAJJID PASHA v. LLOYD INSULATION

AR No. 54 of 2008THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN

Case at a glance

Judgment

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.-------------------------------------------A.R.Nos.54 OF 2008 & 17 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009

O R D E R The parties to these arbitration requests have anagreement between them which contains an arbitration clause. Each of them has appointed an Arbitrator. The said twoArbitrators have not concurred on the appointment of aPresiding Arbitrator. These arbitration requests are filedseeking a measure under such circumstances. The absence ofconcurrence between the two learned Arbitrators has promptedthe parties to request this Court to take a measure bynominating the Presiding Arbitrator. Learned Arbitratorsappointed by the parties being former Judges of different HighCourts, I deem it appropriate that a former Chief Justice of aHigh Court be the Presiding Arbitrator. In the result, Mr.Justice J.B.Koshy, former Chief Justice of Patna High Court is appointed as the Presiding Arbitrator in AR.54/08 & 17/09Page numbersterms of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Office will communicate this decision appropriately. Sd/-THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,Judge.kkb.9/6.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 09 Jun 2009. The bench was THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AR No. 54 of 2008). ← Search more judgments