AR No. 20 of 2007 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
A.R.NO. 20/2007-3-The result is that the Arbitration Request will standallowed. Sri. S.Sainudheen, the retired District & Sessions Judgeis appointed as Arbitrator to settle the disputes between theparties which are subject matters of Annexure-A1 claim notice. The Arbitrator will also settle the counter claims, if any, whichwere raised by the respondent through their claim statement. The Arbitrator will enter on reference at his earliest and passaward without undue delay. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGEks A.R.NO. 20/2007-4-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 01 Feb 2008. The bench was PIUS C KURIAKOSE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.