AR No. 16 of 2007 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The averments in the Arbitration Request and the variousannexures produced along with the same will show that the applicantwas justified in invoking the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of thiscourt under Section 11(6) and (8) of the Arbitration and ConciliationAct, 1996. The Arbitration Request…
Judgment
A.R.No.16/07 - 4 -Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an independent andimpartial Arbitrator.
The opposite party has been served with notice. No counteraffidavit or statement of objections is filed by the opposite party.
The averments in the Arbitration Request and the variousannexures produced along with the same will show that the applicantwas justified in invoking the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of thiscourt under Section 11(6) and (8) of the Arbitration and ConciliationAct, 1996. The Arbitration Request accordingly will stand allowed. Mr.Justice J.M.James, a retired Judge of this court known for hisimpartiality, integrity and efficiency is appointed as Arbitrator tosettle the disputes between the parties over and in respect of Annexure 1 contract including the claims raised by the applicantthrough Annexure 7. The Arbitrator will enter on reference at hisearliest and pass award in accordance with law.srdPIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.