✦ Kerala High Court · 23 Sep 2009

MOHANDAS v. SANTHOSH NAIR

AR No. 3 of 2009THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ...........................................AR.NO. 3 OF 2009............................................DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009ORDER The petitioner and respondents have certain disputesbetween them in relation to the running of a partnership firm. The deed between them contains a clause for arbitration. Onfailure of the respondents to accede to arbitration following thepetitioners' notice, this arbitration request is filed seeking thatappropriate measure be taken. The existence of disputes and theprovisions for arbitration are not disputed. Accordingly, takinginto consideration the nature of the disputes, SriN.Unnikrishnan, Chartered Accountant, Al-ameenShopping Complex, Thana, Irinjalakkuda is appointed as Arbitrator.THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGElgk/26/9

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AR No. 3 of 2009). ← Search more judgments