✦ Karnataka High Court

Gopichand © Gopisingh, S! Devulu Lamani v. The State of Karnataka, Through Chowk Police Station, Gulbarga

Criminal Appeal No. 16152 of 2011B SREENIVASE GOWDA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail refused

of bail is rejected on the ground that he has not complied

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, petition is dismissed with a direction to the trial Court to dispose the main matter i.e. C.C. No.724/2000 as expeditiously as possible. Mgn/- Sd! 3UDGE

Judgment

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA CrLP.NO. 16152 OF 2011 BETWEEN: Gopichand © Gopisingh, S! Devulu Lamani, Age 55 yrs., 0cc: Coolie, R/o. Filter bed Thanda, Tq. & Dist. Gulbarga. (By Sri Ganesh Naik for Sri. Rajendra M.C., Adv.) Petitioner AND: The State of Karnataka, Through Chowk Police Station, Gulbarga. (By Smt. Anuradha M.Desai, Addi. SPP.) Respondent This Crl.P. is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for petitioner praying that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the accused/petitioner on bail in C,C.No, 724/2000 pending on the file of III Addi. JMFC at Gulbarga, which is registered for the offence punishable u.s. 379 of IPC. This Crl.P. coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:- ORDER This petitioner who is arrayed as accused in C.C.No. 724/2000 pending on the file of III Addi. JMFC, Gulbarga, for the offence under Sec.379 of Cr.P.C. has filed this petition seeking to grant him bail under Sec, 439 of Cr.P.C.

Operative part

2.

This Court noticing the fact, the petitioner who was released on bail initially remained absent and therefore warrant was issued against him from time to time since 2000 and an application filed by him before the trial Court for grant of bail is rejected on the ground that he has not complied with the conditions imposed while granting him bail and he is a proclaimed offender, has proceeded to dismiss his petition. 3

3.

At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating petition may be dismissed with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the main matter i.e. C.C. No.724/2000 expeditiously.

4.

Memo is taken on record.

5.

Accordingly, petition is dismissed with a direction to the trial Court to dispose the main matter i.e. C.C. No.724/2000 as expeditiously as possible. Mgn/- Sd! 3UDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: of bail is rejected on the ground that he has not complied

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 379, 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Appeal No. 16152 of 2011). ← Search more judgments