SB No. 110 of 2009 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Nov 2009
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, writ petitions are dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
Years, 0cc: Coojie, and member SDMC, Govt. 11.5. Srimandal Tq. Bidar, rio Srimandal tg. Bidar. . Shesharao sb Dattatri age: 45 years. 0cc: private Service and Member SDMC Govt. H.5. Srimandal rio Srimandal, Tq. & Dist. Bidar.
8. Sripati sic Narsappa, age: 45 years, 0cc: Agril. And member SDI4C Govt. 11.5. Srimandal Tq. Bidar Rio village Nemtabad Tq. Bidar.
9. Sat. Shobha wio Ganapati age 34 years, 0cc: Labour and member of SDMC Govt. H.5. Srimandal rio Srimandal, Tq. & Dist. Bidar. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri.iianmanatharaya Sindhol, Adv.) AND:
Raheemkhan son of not known Age 45 years, 0cc: M.L.A. Rio 9—5—162, Vivekanand Nagar Chidri-road, Bidar.
Vishwanath son of Channappa, Age 45 years, 0cc: Nil, resident Of village Srimandal, . Bidar.
Suit. Shobha wio Mallappa, age 39 Years, 0cc: House hold, resident Of village Srimandal Tq. Bidar.
Suit. Chandrakala wife of Devendra, Age 40 years, Qcc: household, RIo Srimandal Tq. & Dist. Bidar. 3
Kanteppa sb Sangramappa, age 45 Years occu. Agril. Resident of Village Naviaspur tq. Bidar.
Smt. Kundumati wife of Baswaraj Age 34 years Occu. House hold, Rio Srimandal Tq. & Dist. Bidar.
Shanker 5/0 Dhondiba Kambar, age 45 years Occu. Labour resident of village Navalaspur tq. Bidar.
Shivaraj sb Maruteppa Biradar, Age 46 years Occu. Agriculture, Rio Srimandal Tq. & Dist. Bidar.
Block Education Officer, Bidar, Taluka and Dist. Bidar. lO.Head Master, SDMC Secretary Govt. High School, Srimandal TRq. & Dist. Bidar. (By Sri Mallikarjun Sahukar, HCGP for R—9 & 10) RESPONDENTS —0—0—0— quash Annexures—B This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying by 1st C respcndent in file No. MLA/SB/110/2009—2010 dated 4/11/2009 and approved by Respondent No.9 in file No.E2/ADMN/HS/SDMC New Governing Body, Govt. High School, Srimandal Tq. Bidar. issued This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: e 4 ORDER The petitioners sought certain directions in relation to SBM Committee formed to ;cvern the affairs of Government high school, Srimandal, Bidar taluk.
Operative part
3. The matters are taken up for admission. The learned counsel for petitioners has available The Karnataka Grama ?anchayat’s(School Development and Monitoring Committees) (Model) Bye—Laws, 2006, which provide constitution of Grama Panchayath School Development and Monitoring Committee or SDMC. According to Bye-Law 2(1) “School” means includes any Government or Government—aided lower primary school, upper primary school or middle school, Education Guarantee Scheme Centre, residential bridge course center or any other institution/mechanism prescribed by the State r• 5 eZ ecencary c nno, cajoccy of c sD:I cf a Pcvernrcecc sigh school in qaescicc, which ones non fall nir cci mi4 lin or a s hoDi at aforesaid Bve Tnerefore, petitioners are not entitled to a::; iief. . Therefore, writ petitions are dismissed a tce stage of admission. Sd! JUDGE * a lb / —.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, writ petitions are dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 24 Nov 2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.