Sarvjanik International Social v. Taluka Panchavat

ORDER fiBs Deft. ion is filed chailenfind aiinexnre — 1) passing an order appointing second respondent herein fOr rnantenance ]) g” rorn’. ttns-staint its-: cindisputea Incas art file petitioner ncre;n entered into an agreement with first respond.ent rnai nnian the p-:mcw TOii€1Z sitnatec ii ewin’Ci B-ns-- sails! on — ( bc i intla t’hql ti’- .. ..nier&iI mm 1)rl’eCn fl’lttV’fltl flit.1 Inst resj’otalt tat 1’ (øs ‘$‘ 21.i$1 “ Iv—re.i: lI’t t- in :iv d ti I r ,.— zd% 11cc eqi 1 o lx I an” ed 29 Oo )r ill CUfl sear ‘ t%C iii. it LIDIWI I ‘cli’ is chit ;i , 1 1 d ¾ term in! IC 11% 1 dateti QM OO.2t’O’.) err.-rrcl inn, be-iii eji fr’-t ft%p1ICi’11 nd icqt. I’ w L pavi:. the eIat ieg’ i’irls. inspltt- ot t!’-u.

‘Lii lrø 14 11 d ti t i ‘lit Ii ‘it a ‘IL jnz-sj “‘-nan- . ‘S ciL. ‘‘ .Tt “ ci. c Ru ‘-: . a.’ l.,.t’ C - ‘I. ‘ .J. -lii- I — - •i1 I I fl j( .‘: .._ . ‘ • ‘! ‘‘, ‘ — t ..‘ s •t.• •1 — • _1 3 . ‘t 4 . I 3 1 Ii lc L CS - o ir h 1 413 nor pa’ the enhatwt c1 iictnsr Itc .1 LW” over arid abtive .11. a a e “. Ice ith ‘C T4 I ‘Ito ni In ev N 1ia I) r k’ u p ‘ c. H 11 5 U and nfl i9.07 2011 £ aIlui mr his objection, to whit Ij tie us 11(1 wit is o c a I ca ii. ethii& lic’t nt granrt ii t” Iiin 5 St.’ ai a’ p’ incnt — I iii t ii,” tC’ is (‘nil 7fllç(I )J?if—. fo’ p 111n rer tiu,i• ;sdnict., that •b_ pe.11n ‘AT ‘njz1t L’flVC toll U si ii i. r Uc •1 i. I1reLJse fec itid ‘s far a’ nhanremw’i1r of ‘Ii’fl’Sr I’ i- in’ Sc ) ‘ & .fl( ‘ (I ii. £ r .1 ‘ t ‘ ilL i’ r — LI 4 1’ btr’i • ‘g .,j u! i’ ,,,‘ie’’ h t “ ‘a .t1.: •1 I I I r ) 1 t • .—j ‘ , 0 , “:—,C ‘ ,t d ‘ i .r i ‘tt1 .t:, . ,h ; ci ‘r .tpfJIa’t I t I 1’ 4. ‘ i_ I’L :ir •a., a V t F 3 .4 ‘I i v I .. ‘4 — ;(fll I)a qi. .1 1iPJ)Uk J 4 £ ‘ 1Pfl 1 .11 t1 q 1 CIIC LT rT•tsr

1.)S TT’ihutA.To ‘flT’VT..‘41 ‘F•‘a ) ‘F’“itTI”•‘I ‘ II•)IIL’itfl%t I’.:jit tniii, thias-iiqmivajuaai,o4jqnd41)‘in’rtajui;’w IUpiIOIs11piIu.la%T 11J,BW.ITJIT” S11AIttiltI cii_c4iijxTI’T ‘IU” ALTUjLLt.T{1fl iiSt p4’)., a •A’)