Sri Shreekanth v. Smt. Parvathi
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA RPFC No.536/2011 C/WMFA31657/2011 RPFC NO: 536/2011 BETWEEN: Sri Shreekanth S/o Sangappa Hosamani, Aged 43 years, 0cc: Agriculture & Tea Shop, R/o Sarawad, Tq & Dist: Bijapur. (By Sri. Sanjay A Patil, Advocate) Petitioner AND: 1) Smt. Parvathi W/o Shreekanth Hosamani. Age: 38 years, 0cc: H.H Work. 2) Vinayaka 3) S/o Shreekanth Hosamani. Age: 13 years, 0cc: Student. ‘T’ejaswaini D/o Shreekanth Hosamani, Age: 9 years, 0cc: Student. Respondents Sri A Saved Habeed & S.V. Deshmukh Adv for R- 1 R-2 & R-3 minors Reptd by R- 1) This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of Family Court the judgment dated 1 1-04-201 1 passed in Cr1. Act, against Misc. No. 410/2010 on the tile of the Judge, Family Court at Bijapur. wherein, partly allowing petition filed by the petitioners U/S. 125 of Cr.P.C and the petitioners U/S. 125 of Cr.P.C. and the petitioner No. 1 is entitled to the maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,500/- per mouth and the petitioners No.2 and 3 are at Rs. 750/- each per month from the respondent from the date of the Judgment. M.F.A 3 1657/2011 BETWEEN: Sri Shreekanth S/o Sangappa Hosamani, Aged 40 years. 0cc: Agriculture. R/o Sarawad, Tq & Dist: Bijapur. Petitioner (By Sri. Sanjay A Patil. Advocate) AND: I) Srimati Parvathi W/o Shreekanth Hosainani, Age: 35 years, 0cc: H.H Work. 2) Shankarappa S/c) Gurappa Tharndad Age: 35 years. 0cc: Agriculture. Both residents of Sarvad, Taluk & Dist: Bijapur. Respondents This MFA is filed under Section 19(1) of Family Court Act praying Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records in MC Case No:7/2005 before family court at Bijapur; to set aside the impugned judgment dated 11-04-2011, passed by the family court at Bijapur in so far as MC case No: 7/2005, etc., This RPFC & MFA coming on br admission this day, the Court made the following: ORDER The second set of appeal memo is not filed. Even after three years of the commencement of the Circuit Bench, 4 matter to be decided by the Division Bench is presented in single set. Even after 42 days time granted to comply with office objections, the same is not complied with. In these matters the Court cannot show lenience or otherwise. administration will collapse. Petition and the Appeal are dismissed. JUDGE 3UDG ksp/
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.