No. 3009 of 2011 · Karnataka High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ARALI NAGARAJ, H S KEMPANNA
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Dr. C. Nagayya, The General Manager, LAQ and R & R Office, U.K.P. Navanagar, Bagalkot. : Accused (By Shri. Manvendra Reddy. Government Advocate) This C.C.C is filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to initiate proceedings against the…
Judgment
(By Shri. Sanganagouda V. Biradar, Advocate) AND:
G.S. Narayanswarni, The State of Karnataka By its Secretary, Revenue Department Vidhan Soudha, Bangalor-1.
Dr. C. Nagayya, The General Manager, LAQ and R & R Office, U.K.P. Navanagar, Bagalkot. : Accused (By Shri. Manvendra Reddy. Government Advocate) This C.C.C is filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to initiate proceedings against the respondents/accused for their willful and intentional disobeying order dated 20.07.2009 passed in W.P.No.81933/2009 (GM-Res) on the file of this Court as per Annexure-A. Misc. W. 80102/2011 is filed under Section-5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 141 days in filing the contempt petition. This C.C.C. coming on for orders this day, ARALI NAGARAJ J, passed the following: ORDER The order passed in Writ Petition No.81933/2009 in respect whereof the present contempt petition filed is dated 20.07.2009. As such. the present contempt petition filed on 01.02.2011 is barred by limitation. The cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of the 3 application for condonation of delay does not constitute sufficient cause to condone the delay. Accordingly, Misc. W. No8O1O2/2Oll is dismissed consequently, contempt petition stands dismissed. VR Sd/ JUDGE Sd! 3UDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.