Smt. Lab v. I CiT SiTe of Karnat
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N KUMAR
Judgment
Smt. Lab AgeclI 1000011 4 0cc:: A4riculture. 5/ a Satpath.ail, A1: Sc_.i am, 01st.: Cu1bar1m585 I 02. (f3v Sri: Ameel K:u.mar De.shpa.ndc, Advocate I Appel:ant. AND: I CiT SiTe of Karnat cOcoon mcn: of Pepre. Ise nacci [JO \ 1(10111111 ,j’.JL(Ji1C. o 1 .10 C:L(I(DoIrnI. (11001 no lv nupnlv (Jociln:.1. 1(0 IcE :, ColLnrr/i 010: — 1112 [.3. lIne tXee otive ICI.(fiIneOlJ nOOM De I a1_ F 1
The Assistant Executive Engineer 0 & .M. GFDSCOM. Sedani, Tq: Sedam. Dist: Gulharga. Respoudents This Wi’i Appeal is tiled unner beet uu 4 01 the ha ii iatIIa H’h don I W’ pan ira Ic I H i’ It1 i It H I 0 I 2O 1 2 TLt55tId Lv learned sin tide I WI, P. No.54553 / 20 11 (CM KEEl) and iias WE 011 tei i’er as t.h.is Horl’hie court. deem lit in t,h e cirennes 1..anees ot t.,.i* 11 :F5e;, •t•he interest oijnstree Th.is W.7rit Appeal r.o ming on fbi .lldmts.ston I his day, NJ(UMAR, J. delivered the loiloninit: JUDGMENT lire a pellant. has oreterred this WI ii t. Appeal eli all Ii::.nittr.g tn e order i ssed h the Earned sm.gle JulIeT who h.ns dismtsse,d he Writ Petition as h.aving LaconIc in.fr at i.e is. 2; Wed a see any u. still a at I Hi ‘H 1 0 iW e i/ale H IC)v,’€’\er, ,, aRe it \..1’;pyç’ lea ii i/i OH’ anuei.an.i ille.s a..n a.pplieat; lon t.or fresh etc ethe.i.ty eonneetion un.eler the. tegn.lat.hrns, H shalt he eonsidered on nt.eri.ts veiihout tnhng i.n a rv way i.nfl. a,e need by the a riler passed in,’ I H is (don ci a r liv the ‘I 3 learned single judge or by the orders passed by the authorities, in accordance with law. I Sd,.. JLZDQE Sd! JUDGE cM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.