Institute for Manpower Planning v. Career Training Management of Impact college of Engineering and Applied Science at
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordllngly, these appeals are dIsmissed, as having
Provisions considered
Judgment
Nadgir Education Society, A society Registered under the Society Registration Act, Having its office at No.53, 3rd Main Road, Manjunatha Nagar, Bangalore- 10. By its President, Sri. Nadgir S.M.M. c ‘(.S v - : Appellant (By Shri. M.B. Nargund & Sona Vakkund, Advocates) AND:
Visweswaraya Technological University ‘Jnana Sangama’, Belgaum, By its Registrar (Evaluation)
The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, M.S. Buildings, Bangalore-560 001.
The AU India Council for Technical Education, Indraprastha Estate, New Delhi. Represented by the Regional Officer, Palace Road, Bangalore- 1.
The Secretary, C.E.T. Cell, Malleswaram 1 8th Cross, Bangalore. : Respondents (By MIS. Basavaprabhu S. Patil & Associates for R- 1 Shri. M. Kumar, Addi., Govt. Advocate for R-2 & R-4 Shri. N.B. Bhat Advocate for R-3) Note: R-2 to R-4 are impleaded VCO dated 22.06.2007 This writ appeal is filed under section-4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in writ petition No. 2835/2007 dated 2 1.03.2007. In W.A.No.654/2007 BETWEEN Institute for Manpower Planning and Career Training Management of Impact college of Engineering and Applied Science at Kodigehalli, Sahakar Nagar, Bangalore-92. ,1 3 Represented by its Secretary, Smt. Valsala Mathew. Aged about 46 years. : Appellant (By Shri. M.B. Nargund & Sona Vakkund, Advocates) AND:
1. Visweswaraya Technological University ‘Jnana Sangama’, Belgaum- 590014, Represented by its Registrar.
2. The State of Kamataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Higher Education, M.S. Buildings, Bangalore-560 001.
3. The All India Council for Technical Education, Indraprastha Estate, New Delhi. Represented by the Regional Officer, Palace Road, Bangalore- 1.
The Special Officer, C.E.T. Cell, Malleswaram. 18th Cross, Bangalore. : Respondents (By MIS. Basavaprabhu S. Patil & Associates for R- 1 Shri. M. Kumar, Addl., Govt. Advocate for R-2 & R-4 Shri. N.B. Bhat Advocate for R-3) Note: R-2 to R-4 are impleaded VCO dated 22.06.2007 4 This writ appeal is filed under section4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in writ petition No. 3276/2007 dated 22.03.2007. These writ appeals coming on for Admission this day. Manjula Chellur, J. Delivered the following: JUDGMENT The writ appeal No.716/2007 is filed against an interim
21.03.2007 passed W.P.No.2835/2007 and Writ Appeal No.654/2007 is filed challenging the interim order dated 22.03.2007 passed in W.P.No.3276/2007.
3. The learned counsel representing respondents submits Writ Petition Nos.2835/2007and 3276/2007 are disposed of on
30.07.20 10 and 26.11.2008 respectively and therefore, the relief sought in these writ appeals would become infructuous. The above submission has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the appellants. . ‘I 5
Operative part
4. SInce these two appeals are filed against an Interim order and In view of disposal of the msln writ petitions (WP.2835/2007and 3276/2007), the prayer sought In these appea6 does survive consideration. Accordllngly, these appeals are dIsmissed, as having become Infructuous. Sd/ JUDGE Sd! JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordllngly, these appeals are dIsmissed, as having
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Registration Act, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.