Bulla Govindu 5/ Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Kind Camp, Tq v. Bulla Janakiramayya, Si Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Bulla Pattabhiramayya, Sb. Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. Bulia Arjunudu, Sb. Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. ...Respondents This RSA is filed under Section 100 of the CPC against the judgment and decree…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM R.S.A. No.6154/2010 (DEC &INJN) ...Appellant BETWEEN: Bulla Govindu 5/ Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Kind Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. [By Shri J.S. Shetty Associates] AND:
#3. Bulla Janakiramayya, Si Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. Bulla Satyanarayana Si Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. Bulla Krishnamurthy, Sb. Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. :2:
#5. Bulla Pattabhiramayya, Sb. Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. Bulia Arjunudu, Sb. Venkanna, Age: Major, 0cc.: Agriculture, Yerdona Camp, Tq. Gangavathi, Dist. Koppal. ...Respondents This RSA is filed under Section 100 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2010 passed in R.A.No.12/2001 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court - II, at Koppal, dismissing appeal 02.09.2002 O.S.No.121/2001 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gangavathi, dismissing the suit filed for declaration of title and injunction. against decree judgment passed This RSA coming on for orders, Court delivered the following: - this day, JUDGMENT As seen from the order dated 05.09.2011 the appellant was directed to comply with office objections within two weeks on imposition of cost of Rs.500/-, failing which the Registry was directed to post the appeal for further orders. Hence, the appeal has come today. Counsel submits he has not complied office objections. Nc ‘i t,1 appe’ is dismissed defcstivc Psh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 02 Sep 2002. The bench was JAWAD RAHIM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.