Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
This writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. K.John Bell, Rio Kalashitta Badd, Karwar, U K.Dist. . Respondents (By Sn. Vinayaka S.Kulkarni, Govt. Advocate for RI to R5 Sri. Harsh Desai, Advocate for R6 to R8) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying…
Judgment
Vidya Prasaraka Samithi Represented by its Secretary Sri, Gajanana K,Mahale, Sb Ramanna Narayana Mahale, Aged about 64 years, Gb Mandalik Building. Kajubag. Karwar-581301 Uttara Knnada District (By Sri VP.Kulkarni, Advocate) AND. 1 The Secretary, Primary & Secondary Education. Government of Karnataka, Vikas Soudha Dr.Ambedkar Veedhi Bang a I ore. 2 The Commissioner of Public Instructions. College Road, D ha rwa d 3 The Secretary. KSEEB and Joint :2: Director of Public Instruction Belgaum Division. Belgaum-590001. 4 The Deputy Director of Public Instructions. Uttara Kannada Dist.. Karwar-581 301.
#5. The Director of Technical Education. Palace Road, Bangalore.
#6. Chandrahas N.Naik. Sb Nilkani Naik, Age: 45. Rio Kalashita Badd, Karwar, U.K.District. 7 Shashikanth Mahadev Chandavakar, Sb Chandavarkar, Rio Baithkol. Karwar, U.K.Dist.
#8. K.John Bell, Rio Kalashitta Badd, Karwar, U K.Dist. . Respondents (By Sn. Vinayaka S.Kulkarni, Govt. Advocate for RI to R5 Sri. Harsh Desai, Advocate for R6 to R8) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents herein to consider the letter dated 24.02 2000 vide Annexure-R and another letter dated 09 04.2000 vide Annexure-S and direct the Deputy Director of Public Instructions, Karwar to submit a report as per the letter of director of Public Instructions. Belgaum dated 03.03.2008 vide Annexure-T This writ petition coming on for orders this day the Court made the folIowing Vt .3. ORDER Petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties in O.S.No.5311998 on the file of Civil Judge (Jr Dn). Karwar and also sought for liberty to file fresh suit: if need be. Memo is taken on record. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn The question of reserving liberty does not arise in view of the fact that, if new cause of action arises between the parties to initiate any proceedings against each other in respect of the same subject they are at liberty to pursue the same. Sd/a JUDGE Kms
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.