✦ Karnataka High Court · 25 Nov 2011

Judgment · High Court · 2011

5 min read

Judgment

C 0 ( 0 ( 0 ( C 3 - x Z ) — C o 7 0 ( 7 0 ( 7 t i 0 ( 0 ( C t U ( o t 0 ( t C t i c 4C $ 0 ( 9 c c 5 9 D ( ) & D C D U D ( j O D ( % ) c 1 d x o c U ( l D 1 3 ( U ( b P U ( D U i u U ( 4 L , E E D 4 c 1 ( ? l f I 1 ( J 9 0 ( I I C ° U ( D C 4 $ c r c 2 O C ) I L c D C D C D C , D C ’ D C ( D C i1 c 3 7 C D C ) U ) U C D C D C O C ) N ) I D C D C D C D C D C ) U c o c P D C a D C Q - D C I L D C D C t r — D C D C r D T L C c , c ) N D C t i D d C L Z t ‘ n D C D C D C 4 - ) d C - ‘ ‘ D C — D C 0 i 4 L b D C t ) Q D C O C ) U D C ) U I L C I r D C - D C D C ) d C D C - I L I L ) J , 4 ‘ D C L D C D C C C L C N D C . — C ) C - p P P C D a — D C D C > p a t r p D C C D L C P ) C ( D C D C t r C D D C C D C C C C D C > C D D C D C C D L C C D ç 5 C C 9 P . 9 P P C C 9 C C C C 5 9 5 C C C C L C p 5 : r r D C C D C D D C D C p t r C D C C D C p p t ” H r D C P ‘ D D C C D ” P C 9 - - 9 — ) C C D D C 9 D C L C C C P C D t r v L C t r n r p D C > 9 $ . L C C C C D D C H C C p k 2 5 C C . p P p p p t - “ 9 C D 9 p P C C 9 C c ) ç p w D C P D C C C C C D C L C D C 0 C Q 0 j p 0 t r L C P D C r3 C p ) C C ÷ C D D C 9 - j p p t r 9 D C C C C D D C C D C D D C ) C D C C C — i r D C C C — “ C - D D C s P 5 5 E C C P L C p t r C C D C D C P L C D C 9 C C p D C p * 9 D C i ) 5 C L p L C i s 9 C D $ p 9 C D P . , P P D C . r C C D C v . P C I ( “ C D D C D C t r 9 9 L C 9 D C D C D C t P C D C S C ) C . t D C p L C D C 0 L C H C D C p p . L — C D C t r C C D C 9 C D P t r D C r D — C t r C C 9 j 9 C D D C . j < C D ” C p L C i t D C ) C p p C C 9 - P D C 9 9 — D C L C D C 2 D C C C r . + - C D P j j C C C D D C C D P p D C p D C S D C C D H D C D C C D C D D C D C D C i i D C S C C 9 C D p D C H C C D C p 9 S S t - 9 D C . t _ D C D C D C D C C C D C p D C P D C C D — C D C C D C P C D C C D C p C D D C P c r D C C C t - D C C D + - C D D C C D C C H t r P D C t C C D C D C D C - P p C D ) H2 AC‘ D C C D 9 C C C C D C N D C iC D C D C D C C C C i + r C ) i C i r D C • • • • r C C C ) C C ) C C C C . C C ) 1 D • • c y ( C C C : C C 1 D C C C _ • C . 2 H ) C C 9C r C C C C c r c N D C C C C CC C k i c C C

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments