Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The appeal is allowed in part accordingly
Judgment
2 - 3 P ( - 3 - o _ - 3 P ( o P t - - _ 0 t P + - r 3 1 - — o P ( . 2 . 2 Z P ( ; p - o - 3 P ( _ Q H2 .
P - ( ; j r V -7- treatment given to PWs- I and 2. Ex.P.6 is the wound certificate of PW- 1 whereas Ex.P.3 is the wound certificate issued by PW-6 in respect of PW-2. The history recorded in Ex.P.6 and 3 clearly reveal that the injuries were due to assault. The medical certificate Ex.P.3 reveals that PW-2 has sustained stab injury over the chest and some other incised injuries on all over the body. It is the definite case of the prosecution that the knife was used for commission of the offence. The wound certificates Exs.P.6 and 3 and the Summary Sheet Ex.P.4 is spoken to by the doctor PW
He has deposed about the injuries sustained by both injured. It is specifically deposed by the doctor that incised and stab injuries are found over the body of PW-2 on the chest region, face and right wrist. So also PW- 1 had sustained cut injuries and incised injury. Cut/incised injury can be caused by sharp cutting weapon i.e.. knife. Therefore? the ocular evidence is supported by the medical evidence. The version of the prosecution more particularly the version of the injured is again supported by the a a 0 D N N Na a N a — N a N a t a ( a N a N — r D ( N N D : ( H a 0 a a a a a N a a N 0 a — 2 a ( N a D N a a a a a N — N - N N - H - a t ( 0 a — N 2 a a N a N — — N N a — 0 0 N N o a — 0 a a a N 4 a a N o a a N a N 1 O N - - a0 a N 2 N S E + N - i - a a N a N N N 0 a N N 0 - N N N N 2 - a - N — N — — a N a o O 4 0 0 a N a N aNS 0 a o — N N ° • aN0 N N - N a a C 0 o N - a 0 Z N — a N N - N a S4 ‘ — — 5 a 0 NN 0a N a aN a 0 — 0 4 — * a — N — 0 * - — 0 N o N — a N + N — aN NS N 4 o N 4 - k - N 5 N 0 IT - N 0 9 I N N 0 ’ D C D C ‘ a * 2- 1 C D C D C D C C D C — C -C D D D C j D C r D C D C ) C C ) C D C D C C D D I D C - Do C D C f r D C D C 0 D C - 9 D C — c c - r D i c D C D C ) C D C D C D C C i C D C / r c c D C C D D C I ( 2 D C D D I o D C - ) C CC 9 ) C c c : C D C L D D C D C — D C C D C D C c c c c D C a i c a D C c c a D C 9 i c C D C — i c D - _ c c i c c c D C ) C D a C D C ) C C 9 c c ) ) C C D C ) C = c c D C — ) C 9 —— D C ) C c D C - 0 D C D C D C i c D C c c 0 a D C ) C D C c c D C D C i c C a 3 — D C — + - r - c c - - D C C D C a D D I * c c c c c c — r c D C D C 9 c c ) ) C C ) C D C a / C I D C D C D C D C D C c c D C c C a f - C D C D C C D C I D D D C D C C D C D C i C c c a c c — 0 1 2 1 Q D C 0 D C 9 D C c c D C c c D ) c D i c c ) C D C D C j a C — c D C I i c D C D C i c c c 0 — c c D C — D C D C — D C D C D C C C I / C c c D C C C L D C r c c D C D C — / D JC i c D C C C D C D C 9 • C D C D C C i c D C a 3 ( 0 1 2 j — 1 2 — 1 2 ’ C 0 - k 1 2 1 2 ) 1 2 2 2 1 3 ( 3 3 2 1 D C 2 / 2 3 ( 2 D C _ 1 —— 1 2 2 D C t - / 2 : 3 ( ) 3 - C 3 ( 3 ( D C f ( Q Q J D C 0 3 3 3 ( 3 ( - 4 — - 3 3 - 3 1 / — 1- 2 D C 5 : ) 2 m C 1 - - C o 1 / 2 1 ( ( / 2 / 2 3 ( D C - — ì - — a - 3 1 2 2 — D C - C ’ C 2 ( ( 2 1 + - t - 5 : 2 2 - t - 2 3 ( 3 ( - 3 3 1 2 ’ C 0 o I - - ) l C — — — 2 1 ( D C - - D - C 1 ( D C t C 3 ( 30 C - ( IC2 2 / ( 3 ( J - - C D C 3 0 ( D C ) 3 2 / 2 D C o( 3 ” r - 3 ( 3 ( 3 ( r ) C 0( 3 3C ( 0 — D C 3 ( 3 ( D C 0 ) ! 2 — i - D C 3 ( 3 ( ( 0 0 3 ( o 3 32( ( 3 ( D C a( 3 - r D C — a - D C 3 ( - r _ 3 ( ) 3 ( 3 ( D C 2 / ( I : ) - 3 ( 3 ( _ D C — 3 ( D C 3 ( D C 1 — 2 1 ( r 3 ( ) C - C 3 ( 0 2 / ( - 3 ( - 3 ( - 3 ( - o 3 ( - 3 ( * - I L t - C o 3 ( 3 ( 3 ( L 3 ( 3 ( 3 ( D C o 3 ( 3 ( ( t - D C t - - D C l - o t - j a 2 1 C / ( 1 C D ) ‘ 34 - ( 1 )( 1 ( D C 3 ( D C 3 ( I L 3 ( C / 2 2 2 C - 3 ( Q J y _ - ( 3 C I 2 1 ‘ — a ) C ) C ) C C ) — )a c ) C ) C - a ) C C — — a ) C - t Cr - ? ) C C - ) C C a - ) a - C a C )a a C ) C H a ) C ) ) C C 9 a — - - ) C C - aa — — a aC ) a - ) C — a C ) C C I ( - ) ) C C ? C J - a a ) C a — ; - a ) C ) C ) - C ) C t - ) ) C C ) C a /C — ) C aa- ) C ) ) C C a ) C a ) a C - 1C )C ) C a ) C ) C ) C C ) C a —aC ) J _ - C C )a — ) C ) C )a C ) C C ( ) C a 1 ) C ) CC ) C a- C C )a ) CC + r ) ) C ) CC a ) C xC ) — a aaC - ) a a ) C C C - — ) C a C ) ) ) C C *9 — C — a ) C ) C - ) ) C C C ( ) C — — a ) C a ) C a - 4 Q ) C I ) C — f C ) C ) ) C C a C ) — C ) C ) C ) C a ) C a ) ) ) C C C ) a C C ( - a - - - p j a a a ) c ) C ) ) C C a 4 ) C t r ) C C a a ( a I ) C a ) C * — ) ) ) C C C ) J * a a ) C 4 V -J2-
Operative part
The appeal is allowed in part accordingly. We appreciate the assistance of Smt.S.M.Nadaf, learned Amicus Curiae. She shall be paid honorarium of Rs.5,000/-. Sd! JUDGE Sa/ JUDGE Jm/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is allowed in part accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 23 Nov 2011.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.