YASHAVANT v. STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADUR POLICE, HAVERI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104452 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: YASHAVANT, S/O SHANTAPPA BENAGERI @ BENNIGERI, AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HOSUR-577427, TQ. SHIKARIPUR, DIST. HAVERI. (BY SRI. VIJAY M. MALALI, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH ADUR POLICE, HAVERI, REP BY SPP. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH DHARWAD-581100.
MOHAN S/O SHIVAPPA BALAMBID, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC. LABOUR, R/O MADIVAL ONI, TILAVALLI HANGAL, DIST: HAVERI-581110. (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1; NOTICE SERVED TO R2) CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench …PETITIONER …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 2 IN SC NO. 103/2022 ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO. 94/2022 IN ADUR PS PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I HAVERI FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 376(D), 341, 376(2)(L), AND 34 OF IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC-D:543 CRL.P No. 104452 of 2025 HC-KAR THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: “Advocate for petitioner submits as under: The petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition after material witnesses are examined. Hence this memo.”
Operative part
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.