✦ Karnataka High Court · 14 Feb 2024

Judgment · High Court · 2024

Writ Petition No. 107393 of 2023RAVI V HOSMANI2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Court, this writ petition is allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of disposal of writ petition, pending applications are disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Judgment

1. SMT. AMMAJAN KHOJAPEER INAMDAR, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. NO.307, MARUTI GALLI, ANGOL, TQ: AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590006.

2. SHRI MRUTUJA S/O. KHAJAPEER INAMDAR, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. NO.307, MARUTI GALLI, ANGOL, TQ & DIST: BELAGAVI-590006.

3. SHRI OBEDULLA S/O. KHAJAPEER INAMDAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. NO.307, MARUTI GALLI, ANGOL, TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590006.

4. SHRI JAGADISH UMANABADIMATH, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. PACHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591122.

5. MR. BABAJAN S. DESAI, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. GODACHANMALKI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI-591307.

6. MR. CHANDRASHEKAR S. HUDDAR, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. PACHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591122. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH +0530 - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:6348 WP No. 107393 of 2023 …PETITIONERS

7. MR. SANNASHETTAPPA B. KUDAJOGI, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. PACHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591122. (BY SRI SANTOSH B. RAWOOT, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

FATTEKHAN DESAI HIGH SCHOOL TRUST, PACHAPUR, TAL: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI, BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHRI ASHOK BASAPPA CHANDAPPAGOL, AGE: 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MAVANUR, TAL: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI-591122.

2.

MR. DILDAR H. SIKKALGAR, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. PACHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591122.

3.

MR. SHRIDHAR N. MUTNAL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. PACHAPUR, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591122. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MALLIKARJUN B. MADANALLI, ADV. FOR R1; R2 & R3 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION, BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED: 30-10-2023 PASSED BY THE VIII ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE BELAGAVI IN MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.225/2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-D, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:6348 WP No. 107393 of 2023 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking for following reliefs: a. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ or direction, by quashing the order dated: 30-10-2023 passed by the VIII Addl. District Judge Belagavi in Miscellaneous Petition No.225/2015 vide Annexure-D, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Sri Santosh B.Rawoot, learned counsel petitioners as well as Sri Mallikarjun B.Madanalli, learned counsel for respondent no.1 submit that subject matter is covered by decision of this Court in W.P.no.102494/2023 disposed of on 14.02.2024 and order at Annexure-D is set at naught.

Operative part

3. Reserving liberty to parties to proceed under Section 92 of Code of Criminal Procedure before appropriate Court, this writ petition is allowed.

4.

In view of disposal of writ petition, pending applications are disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Court, this writ petition is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 92.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Karnataka High Court, on 14 Feb 2024. The bench was RAVI V HOSMANI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 107393 of 2023). ← Search more judgments