✦ Karnataka High Court

SriJsmail Maroof Khan v. State of Karnataka

B V PINTO

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Judgment

Operative part

THE HON’BL! MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10805/2011 BETWEEN: SriJsmail Maroof Khan Pathan a’ Ustad Age: 37 years, 0cc: Agriculture R/o. Hirebagewadi Tal & Dist: Belgaum (By Sri. Srinand A. Pachachapure, Adv.) PETITIONER AND: State of Karnataka Through Hirebagewadi PS., Belgaum Now rep. by SPP (By Sri. Vinayak S. Kulkarni, HCGP) RESPONDENT This criminal p’?tition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C seeking to grant bail to the petitioner with conditions in S.C.No.341/201 1 on the file of Presiding Officer, Fast Track-Il) & Add). MACT. Belgaum (Crime No.44/2010 registered for the offences p/u/s. 143. 147, 148, 307, 302, 109 R/w Section 149 of IPC by the respondent Hirebagewadi Police. — This criminal petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: - ORDER The learned Ccunsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permit ted to withdraw the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/i. JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 149.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments