SHRI TAJUDDAIN ABDUKREHMAN HANCHANMANI v. THE COMMISSIONER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 116
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105701 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHRI TAJUDDAIN ABDUKREHMAN HANCHANMANI AGE 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O, SHOP NO 14, MAHATMA PHULE VEGETABLE MARKET, BELAGAVI 590001. (BY SRI. SHARAD MALGOUND PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF CITY OF BELAGAVI S P ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001 …PETITIONER …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO,1. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASHED THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED. ---- PASSED BY THE APPELLATE COURT 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BELAGAVI IN M.A. NO. /2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONTINUE THE LEASE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER RELATING TO THE SUIT PROPERTY ON THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS MADE APPLICABLE TO THE SHOPS OF THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION IN FISH MARKE, MARKET AT KASAI GALLI AND MARKET AT MAHATMA PHULE ROAD AND ETC.,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:13379 WP No. 105701 of 2024 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
Operative part
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 116
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.