✦ Karnataka High Court

Judgment · High Court

K L MANJUNATH, K GOVINDARAJULU

Case at a glance

Bench
K L MANJUNATH, K GOVINDARAJULU

Provisions considered

Judgment

SRI. RAMESH S/O GANGARAM PAWALE, AGE: 46 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS. R/0 CTS NO.1143, ANANTSHAYAN GALLI, BELGUM. (BY SR1.G.B.SHASTRY, ADV.,) AND: SMT. LAXMIBAI, W/O BABURAO JADHAV, AGE: MAJOR, CCC: BUSINESS, R/O 653/lA, NARGUNDAKAR BHAVE CHOWK. RAVI WAR PETH, BELGAUM. (BY SRI.V.P. KULKARNI, ADV.) COMPLAINANT ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED U/S. 11 AND 12 R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING COMMITFED CONTEMPT BY NOT COMPLYING THE TERMS OF UNDERTAKING ON AFFIDAVIT DATED: 05.02.2009 AS PRAYING INITIATE ACT, TC)

06.01.2009 PER ORDER DATED: PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT TN RSA NO.5147/2008 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURES-A AND B AND THE ACCUSED MAY BE DIRECTED TO HAND OVER THE POSSESSION OP THE SUIT PROPERTY FORTHWITH TO THE COMPLAINANT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FRAMING OP CHARGES THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J, MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The matter is listed for framing of charges. The respondent is present before the Court. She tenders unconditional apology. She has filed a memo to that effect. According to her she is an illiterate lady and was incapable of understanding the orders of the Court. She has stated that she has overstayed illegally for 2 1 months and she is willing to pay the rent for the period of 2 1 months for her overstay.

2.

We accept statement made by the respondent who is present before the Court,

3.

In view of tendering unconditional apoloT before the Court and agreed to pay arrears of rent for a :3: period of 21 months to the petitioner, the petition is closed. GH Sd.! Sd/ JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments