MANJUNATH v. HANUMANTAPPA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
objections failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., A.M. ARKED COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, C.G. HOSPITAL, VIDYARTHI BHAVAN ROAD, DAVANAGERE, DIST: DAVANAGERE-577001. * * * * * ... RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M. SHYAM PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103692 OF 2017 (MVC) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH S/O SHIVABASAPPA KOTER AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & MASON, R/O: BHOVIGALLI, TQ: HANGAL, DIST: HAVERI. …APPELLANT (By Sri./Smt : UMESH C AINAPUR & Sri. H.R.LATUR, Advs.) AND:
#1. HANUMANTAPPA S/O PUTTAPPA CHIKKERI AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O: CHEERANAHALLI PIN-581104, TQ: HANGAL, DIST: HAVERI.
#2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., A.M. ARKED COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, C.G. HOSPITAL, VIDYARTHI BHAVAN ROAD, DAVANAGERE, DIST: DAVANAGERE-577001. * * * * * ... RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 02.11.2016 passed in 2 MVC No.152/2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Addl. MACT, Hangal. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R A week’s time is granted as a last chance to comply with office objections failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the bench. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 12.10.2018, the Advocates for appellant have not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.103692/2017 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
27.07.2018. R By: mh C By: mh T By: nd BY ORDER OF THE COURT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. Sd/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: objections failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.