KUNTOJI, ADVOCATES v. DIST: BELAGAVI 591 212
Case at a glance
- Bench
- E S INDIRESH
Outcome
Dismissed
the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench
Provisions considered
Judgment
SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O RAMAPPA BILLUR AGE: 64 YEARS OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330.
SIDDAPPA S/O RAMAPPA BILLUR AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 CHANNAPPA S/O RAMAPPA BILLUR AGE: 43 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 SANGAPPA S/O RAMAPPA BILLUR AGE: 41 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 SMT. DODDAWWA W/O RAVINDRA PATIL AGE: 34 YEARS OCC: SERVICE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 2 NOW AT: PTS DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD 580 001
LAXMAN S/O MALLAPPA BILLUR AGE: 60 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330
MUTTAPPA S/O BAIRAPPA BILLUR AGE: 30 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330.
MALLAPPA S/O SATTEPPA BILLUR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS SMT. INDRAWWA W/O MALLAPPA BILLUR AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330. SACHIN S/O MALLAPPA BILLUR AGE: 25 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330.
VISHWANATH S/O MALLAPPA BILLUR AGE: 28 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330
BASAPPA S/O SATTEPPA BILLUR AGE: 40 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TAKKALAKI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330. (By SRI: GIRISH .A. YADAWAD, DIVYA .J. DESHPANDE, RAHUL S. KUNTOJI, ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANTS) ...APPELLANTS 3 AND 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 .
SMT. SUGALADEVI @ PARVATI W/O MALLANAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLDWORK, R/O: VIAJAYAPUR, DIST: VIJAYAPUR SMT. ASHARANI W/O NIGANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: VIAJAYAPUR, SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O RAMANGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KANAMADI, TQ & DIST: VIJAYAPUR 586 114. SMT. SULOCHANA W/O SANGAMESH SANGAM, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MUDDEBIHAL, TQ: VIJAYAPUR DIST: VIJAYAPUR 586 212. SMT. GODAVARI W/O KRISHNAGOUDA NYAMAGOUDA AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330. DHARIGOUDA S/O KRISHNAGOUDA NYAMAGOUDA AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 RAJASHEKHAR S/O MADIVALAYYA HIREMATH AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330 SMT. MAHADEVI W/O OMKARI GURAV AGE: 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: JUNJURWAD, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI 591 230 4
9. SMT. JAYASHREE W/O MALLIKARJUN BADAGI AGE: 54 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: JAMBAGI B.K., TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT 587 330
10. DADASAHEB S/O PEERAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: ANANTAPURA, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI 591 212
VISHAL S/O DADASHEB PATIL AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: ANANTAPURA, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI 591 212 VARSHA D/O DADASHEB PATIL AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: ANANTAPURA, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI 591 212 VAISHNAVI D/O DADASHEB PATIL AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: ANANTAPURA, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI 591 212 …RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.09.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.5054/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT, TO SIT AT JAMKHANDI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND PARTLY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2019, PASSED IN O.S. NO.83/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JAMKHANDI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. 5 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
Operative part
O R D E R Four weeks time is granted to remove the office objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 19.06.2025. Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100658/2024 stands dismissed without reference to Bench as per the Court Order dated 08.04.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:- C- By:-vk T- By: -vg
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.