✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT N MANJULA v. SMT Y NAGARATHANAMMA

CRL.P No. 103107 of 2025V SRISHANANDA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

memo, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Placing the submission on record, subject to filing of the memo, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.103107 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT N MANJULA D/O LATE THIPPAISH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE R/O SADASHIV NAGAR, SIRUGUPPA TQ. SIRUGUPPA, DIST. BALLARI 583101 (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA A MALI, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND:

1.

SMT Y NAGARATHANAMMA D/O CHALUVAIAH AGE :66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST R/O. MURUVANI CAMP, NOW R/AT. SIRUGUPPA TQ. SIRUPPA DIST. BALLARI 583101 Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

2.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SIRUGUPPA P.S. NOW REPRESENTED BY THE HCGP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD 580001 (BY SRI VISHWANATH BICHAGATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT.GIRIJA HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R2) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE(UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH THE VERY PRIVATE COMPLAINT DATED 29-1-2010 IN P.C.NO.4/2010 AND THE PURSUANT CHARGE SHEET AS WELL (CRIME AS PROCEEDINGS C.C.NO.574/2013 FURTHER - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:17282 CRL.P No. 103107 of 2025 HC-KAR NO.18/2010) SIRUGUPPA PS) ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SIRUGUPPA REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 419, 420, 468, 471 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC IN SO FAR AS THE SAME RELATE TO THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 4 HEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Matter pertains to Dharwad Bench and is taken up at Bengaluru through video conferencing.

2. Sri Ramachandra A.Mali, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would file a memo in the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

Operative part

3.

Placing the submission on record, subject to filing of the memo, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE List No.: 19 Sl No.: 1

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: memo, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.P No. 103107 of 2025). ← Search more judgments