SHRI SWARAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 384, 504, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. SHRI NARAYAN S/O. NAMADEV GOUDA, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: GOLDSMITH, R/O. BANASAGERI, VILLAGE, POST: HALIYAL, TAL: HALIYAL, T-ADD VADAGAV, BELAGAVI CITY, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA, PIN CODE-590005. (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.528…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102614 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS) BETWEEN: SHRI SWARAJ S/O. YALLARI NAKADI, AGE: 30 YERS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. H.NO. 217/6, ADARSH NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590005. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SAVITA V. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, HALIYAL POLICE STAITON, HALIYAL-581329, NOW REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD. HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
Operative part
SHRI NARAYAN S/O. NAMADEV GOUDA, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: GOLDSMITH, R/O. BANASAGERI, VILLAGE, POST: HALIYAL, TAL: HALIYAL, T-ADD VADAGAV, BELAGAVI CITY, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA, PIN CODE-590005. (BY SRI. ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1) …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S.528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN HALIYAL P.S. CRIME NO.55/2025, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. HALIYAL, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 384, 504, 506 OF IPC TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:9132 CRL.P No. 102614 of 2025 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads thus: ’’ Herein memo on behalf of petitioner is as under. The petition filed quashing petition against F.I.R complaint, but in Trial Court entire charge sheet filed. Therefore I request to file and liberty fresh petition against said proceedings. Hence this memo.’’ Memo is placed on record. In view of the memo and counsel submission, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted as sought for. Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE HMB /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 384, 504, 506.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.