SMT. B BHEEMESHWARI v. K BANDAIAH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 103182 OF 2024 (MV) BETWEEN 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . ROOPA PATIL Digitally signed by ROOPA PATIL SMT. B BHEEMESHWARI W/O LATE RAMANJINEYULU AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE RATHNA D/O LATE RAMANJINEYULU AGED ABOUT: 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT MINOR GOWTHAMI D/O LATE RAMANJINEYULU AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT MINOR SINDHU D/O LATE RAMANJINEYULU AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT PETITIONERS NO’S 3 AND 4 ARE MINOR SINCE MINORS R/BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER PETITIONER NO. 1 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF H.NO. 236/A/36 UMAMAHESHWARI NAGAR, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT NEAR KARKANA MASJID, SHIVLINGA NAGAR, BALLARI 583101 (By SRI : Y LAKSHMIKANT REDDY) ... APPELLANTS 2 AND 1 . K BANDAIAH S/O K BANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, DRIVER OF THE TRACTOR/TRAILER BEARING REG. NO. AP-02/W-8509 AND 8510 R/O GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANTHAPUR DISTRICT 515801 2 . THARVATHAMMA B., W/O. PRAHALAD REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OWNER OF THE TRACTOR/TRAILER BEARING REG.NO.AP-02/W-8509 AND 8510 R/O FUNCTION HALL, GUNTAKAL TOWN, ANATHAPUR, DIST. 515801 3 . THE BRANCH MANAGER M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD, OPPOSITE MAYURA LODGE, BALLARI-583101 …RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 02.01.2021 passed in MVC No.45/2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-XII, Ballari. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
Operative part
O R D E R Finally four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE 3 //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 103182 of 2024 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
06.02.2025. T By: vg C By: sdp BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.