The Managing Director, NWKRTC, Central Office v. Smt. Parawwa
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
this Stage. Smt. Shaila Bellikatti, submitted that she would take notice on behalf of Respondents I & 2 and she intend to file cross-objection with regard to the quantum of compensation. 5) As noticed above, though initially appellant questioned the quantum of compensation also, subsequently the said challenge has been withdrawn. the claimants are dis-satisfied with the quantum, are at liberty to question the same in an independent I appeal Then fore qw stiot of kc eping th s tppc ii jx ndin g tot t nahhn’ t1 aimant s to I ic (toss ol p (tic Its tit n) In ticv cf thc aboc the appeal is zlleacd hit judgnnnt and aiard passtd b) thi Thbut alit MW No 363 200 insofar is it reiatc i to fiing flit habthfl on thc appellant NWKRIC is herelw itt iside Responcknt No I herein, Respondint Nn 2 in he rlim petitinri befnra the tnbunil namel> ‘%ational Insurarne Complaint I td is dn-ccted to pa the cnnn wmpensation ic quant Ic in flit Inbunil r innunt dcpcs ci ‘ I It d’r .a t S Cs
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.