High Court · 2011

(By Sri, H.S. Chandramouli, S..P.P.) ... Responde.nt This criminal appeal is filed U/s. 374(2) of Cr.P.C., by the advocate for the appellant for the appellant pleased to in SCNo.76/2OO7 dated: 02.04.09 and order of conviction passed by the Fast Track Court (Belgaum) sitting at Baiihongal, against (accused No.6) thereby acquit the appellant for the alleged offences. I and Addi. Sessions Judge, the appellant Judgernent These appeals coming on this day for delivered Sreedhar Rao, J.. K. hearing, following: fii. al JUDGMENT fiJiL.

1. The appellants in Cri.A.No.2653/2009 are accused Nos, I to 5 (for short A. I to A.5), appellant in Crl.A.No.2827/2009 is accused No.6 (for appellants CrI.A.No.2652/2009 are accused Nos,7 to (fox’ t.i .Y). ‘F1.rii’.u,ZUf 0/ A jIjct U h e S tate c h all en gin g b.c o r d e r ( I o f accu.sed Nos. 10 13 (for short A. 10 t.o .A. 13) passed by the Trial Court. H - 3 0 3 ( ) a 0 ) 0 0 3 _ 3 0 a , a 3 c0 a : c - D C D C 3 0 a , a t — ) 0 3 0 3 : a 3 a0 1 ( a a 3 0 a 1 0 1 0 * a - 3 0 L 3 0 3 0 1 0 a a 3 0 D C D C f C 2 00 3 3 D C a C 2 - — _ 3 0 a a l E , a D C 3 0 1 0 1 0 a 2 D1a * : L C D C 3 0 3 0 : - — 1 , a E ) D a D C 3a : 3 0 1 ( a o r 3 0 a f C * , a ) 0 r 0 ( 1 0 0 ( a 3 ( ) 0 ) i i D C 1 0 a ) 0 ) 0 3 ( 1 — D C a l a C a 0 1 a - ) 0 a - D C a + C I a 2 3 0 3 : 1 ( a C p -a a a a U U ) U - U a a - a 0 a : 52 a 5 : - 4 C o a a 1aa ( H a a - — a a - 0 - a a a U - U — I o S a a ‘ i S a a I a a - 5 : a - - - a a t - a— + a r E a a a C *0C C S 3 C 0C 3 ( - * 3 C 3 3 C3 C C ) C C 0 3 3 CS( 3 3 O C C - 4 I C‘ — 4 — C 3 ( k 0 C ( 1 ( D 1 — 3 3 j l 3 f — 3 3 — L C 3 3 3 3 - — 3 ( 3 _ ‘ 1 — 0 — J ) C C 0 3 C C 3 3 - T I T / 4 3 / C \ C / - ( j — C 3 C 3 1 - c 1 ( 3 ) 3 - C 3 ‘ C 3 1 ( C ( 0 C Vt ’ t 0 t - E - P r 4 ) . 0 4 t 4 - C d — V o o C . 0 C o — 3 C ‘ C E 5 4 ) ‘ 0 4 ) t a . C d c ’ ‘ d 1 - . 4 - — A t C - “ — ‘ . . c a ‘ t i a 2 ) - q a . 4 2 ) t ’ p 0 ) a r 4 - i . 2 — ‘ 4 S . . C . . 4 ) C ) 4 ) . C . C . C V2 , . C d 0 C . m 4 J 4 V r 4 . h . C — C t ‘ - • t - - — C o c A ‘ - a . r 4 . e c d C t i o C C I — ) 0 p 2 H 2 . t ‘ C d E a I - — c p r c . . C . . t a — . ‘ D 4 4 3 - a l t C -aaaa a C — — - Da aaaaa aa aa a a a - a a a a a a a I 3 - a a a : : — a a a - a e - a - Q 3 - 3 - a a( a H - a a t r t - a - a a a * a a i a - a a — - a a a a - a - - a a —aa a a a 1a - j — a 3 - C a J a ; a a a C r a a a a a a a c 1 ‘ * a a - a I - a - - C c a a a c c c1 c c c 1 - a c c a - o4 , - I - C a , a - - - 0 a - a I c c c c 0 - a C - c c c c c - 0 j j ‘ i c c c - 1 - . c c c c c c s : - 4 , a ) i c o - — c c ) c c H c c - 4 - c c - - c c c c c c c c c S4 c a a C ) c c , a c c c ) i c c c i c c c ( c a c , i c - . c c c c j 0 - — a a a c c Q J - v - c Q - ( 1 1 a : 0 C D — C C C 1 : C C - C - C 0 c I Q x ( C C I C j % ) ) 0 _ ( I C i c D I i c C t r ) C c i c 1 f CC - 1 0 D I D I 1 0 5 i c D I — D I i c D — D I r C ) D I 0 I — - C i c — t r 0 1 - ) i c - o i c 0 1 ( + - ) C Q T C D I - D I 0 I - 0 - . — i c - C , - - 1 _ i c ) c y0 D I D I — - - 5 C D I 1 ( - I C 1 0 - C- o i c i c C C ) c ) 0 i c - D I — 0 1 - i c D I ) 0 1 i c - - 5 f C i c i c - c c 0— c C f C 1 . - i c - D 1 0 0 r C i c D I ) C D I D I c - 1 i r c i - D I — 1 i c D I i c i r C c c D I ) I _ c — i c D I Dt I c I _ — D I ) 0 sound and proper. With reference to conviction of 1 to Ad it is clear from the evidence of PW. I that. ‘a hen the A. 1 had s nccccocci in the suit and OW. I and D. I to 3 and others tried to harvcsrinsz the crop. the A. 1 to A 13 co’me to the scene and there was a quarrel and scuffle and later ass a lilt,

15. The appellants/accused Nos. I S Cr521 No.2653, 2009, the appcilant/ accused No 6 in CrLNo2182 7 / 2009 appcilants/ a.. c.crtscd Nos,7 to 9 in CrhANo2652/2009, have catrscd three deaths, therefore, the Trial Court convic.tcd them U/s302 of.1PC and acquitted the 2110 to 13. But it is clca,r from the evidence of SW. I that A. I had succeeded in•. the suit and PW. I and deceased arc. trcu to harvest the crop of A. I to A. I therefore, there was a quarrel and scuffle and r — C0 0 L D C C L C — D C ) 1 $ L D C C C D C ’ C L D C C f - f L C — L C C C C C C C c C C D C - D C D j C 1 i — / ) C C ) I — C j L C ) C - D C - D C D C D C D D - D C - L f C ) D j L C 1 ’ C i I C D C z D C j Q J D C - 4 - D C - r C ) ’ C — t r ’ — C — — 1 o D C L C D) C C ) D C ’ C - D C ’ C — D C D —C fC C - C - _ _ ’ L ? 4 ) L C C CI j C j t C I 1 ( C 16 Corrected The A. 1 to A.9 are entitled for benefit of set off vide Court order data Sentence of impnarnraent ahas.L 24.02.tOIl i’.— U/s.428 of Cr.P.C. run concurrently. From the fine amount, PW. 1 shall be paid compensation of Rs.350,000/- Communicate operative Judgment to the Trial Court as well as to the jail authorities. portion Sd/ JUDGE Sd! JUDGE HRN! ‘11iSN IIOZ/ZO/tZ TQ::O)UOTUfodc,iijpi(j 6OOL9°\\I’)6OU/Es_°c‘vI) T’)N____ Q1°‘ [i10J4U!1 .J.1TUdo ‘TI supdqpnosH)(L1)/I P’W!1UUIUuSiJUIii1JO \11Li0OTU L1 TU ..IL IOc an[ ____ ____