SMT JAYASHREE PRAHLAD KOTTALAGI v. MR DNYANESHWAR B WADAR
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C M POONACHA
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 105433 OF 2023 (MV I) BETWEEN 1 . SMT JAYASHREE PRAHLAD KOTTALAGI AGE ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. TAILOR EKUNDI JIRGYAL 416402 TQ. JATH, DIST. SANGALI, MAHARASHTRA (By SRI. P.V. GUNJAL, SRI. G.D BADAKUNDRI AND ULLAS DODDAMANI, ADVS.) ... APPELLANT AND 1 . MR DNYANESHWAR B WADAR BY HIS LRS SMT MAHADIVI DNYANESHWAR WADDAR MAJOR, HOUSEWIFE 2 . MST OMKAR DNYANESHWAR WADAR 13 YEARS, STUDENT 3 . MST PRAVEEN DNYANESHWAR WADAR 13 YEARS, STUDENT (RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 BEARING MINORS R/BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RESP. 1) 2 ALL R/O: BASAVESHWAR KIVAN, EKUNDI JIRGYAL 416402 TQ. JATH DIST. SANGALI 4 . TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., PENINSULA CORPORATE PARK, NICHOLAS PIRAMAL TOWER 9TH FLOOR, GANPATRAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL MUMBAI 400013 R/BY ITS BRANCH AT HALL MARK BUILDING 3RD DESAI CROSS, BESIDES INDUS IND BANK HUBBALLI 580029 ******** ... RESPONDENT This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Award dated 28.09.2022 passed in MVC No. 1559/2019 on the file of the XI Addl. District Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Belagavi. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
O R D E R Office objections to be complied with within six weeks, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. SD/- JUDGE 3 //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 05.04.2025, the Advocate for appellants has not complied the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 105433 of 2023 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated
25.11.2024. T By: cnb C By: lh BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.