SRI SANGAPPA FAKKIRAPPA v. SMT BASAVVA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
which, the petition stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 47 r. 1
Judgment
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RP NO.100102 OF 2024 BETWEEN SRI SANGAPPA FAKKIRAPPA ANGADI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS SRI SURESH SANGAPPA ANGADI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE R/O SAIDAPUR TQ NAVALGUND AND OTHERS ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANKET M. YENAGI, ADV.) AND SMT BASAVVA W/O NINGAPPA YADWAD AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS OCC COOLIE R/O BASAPUR 582201 TQ NAVALGUND AND OTHERS …RESPONDENT REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.03.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN RA NO. 100398 OF 2018, BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT REVIEW PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. CONSEQUENTLY, RESTORE THE RSA NO. 100398/2018 ON 2 THE FILE, BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT REVIEW PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS MATTER COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING;
Operative part
O R D E R One week time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the petition stands dismissed without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE Note As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this above matter stands dismissed without reference to Court. as per the Court Order dated:20.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: which, the petition stands dismissed without reference to the Court
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 47 r. 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.