THE DEPUTY COMISS1 ONER BAGALKOT DISTRICT, BAG ALKOT v. SRI RANGAPPA
Case Details
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
Judgment
1. KG BAOAMI BA( ,ALKQ’l’ DISTRICT .87 ‘01. DY U II RIINM1 Vt YFARS. AXlE. 0CC AGRICULTURF. x 0 BkD?M1 5t7 201, C K )I dC - I F sRI13StLAPPA q• o KO1PP OGX\NAVaR IF’ CL El ?Y R 21 R 0’DAGL. TQ 84DAM’. L3UA hot E)i”RICT P1 H Nb SPE S n I’.ONA?P4 Ob’N’i?’bAR AGT ‘C (. :b yrpc IR A AC P y ‘ il ‘‘. c9ç C —Y 7
8. 9,
10. II. SMT TI PPAWWA W ‘0 RAN GNPPA AGE: SOYEARS. 0CC: AGRICULTURE. K CM cALDR\;\ BADAMI, BACALKOT DISTRICT,
SRI RAMANNA S / 0 RANCAPRA MACHACAR. AGE: 60 YEARS. N U iU H1jrn C’ EADAMI, BACALKOT DISTRICT. Th:’’ T[ SMT RANCAWWA SR EXAPPA BHOVLMANL ACE: 58. YEARS. 0CC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, fl )t’ flT TT1 “N. ‘1r’- K! tJ OfiUK. U. bni*’uvt. BAGALKOT Dl STRI CT. SMT LAKSHMAWWA W7/O MALIAPPA MATTIKARAI, ACE: 56 YEARS, 0CC: ROUSER OLD WORK, R/0 BELCR, TQ: BADAMI, BAGALKOT D.. ISTRICT. SIVIT TULAJAV’JWA W/O HANUMUNTAPPA BANDL AGE: 54 YEARS. 0CC: ROUSER OLD WORK, R 0 TEA N. DL1RCAWWAN CUD I, MACFIAGAR ONI, KOPPAL KOPPAL Dl/STRIC7T.
12. SRiRANCAPFA 5 0 UL ACE: /9 YEARS, K ‘ I 13
14. 15; :4: IALCK:BADAMI, SAGA LKOT DISTRICT; SRI LAXMAPPA S/C) RANGAPPA MACPAGAR. AGE: 39 YEARS R/ 0 MACI-IAGAR C)Ni, TALUK :BADAMI, BAGAL:KOT DISTRICT. SMT RPTNAWWA BHARMAPPA BANDI, AGE: 36 YEARS. 0CC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O NEAR DURCAWWAN GUDI, MACHAGAR ONI, TALDK: BADAMI, BAGALKCT DISTRI CT; SMTLAXMIDEVI W!O BHIMRAO DESHPANDE. AGE: 59 YEARS, DCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, 3 DNRADRADCT TALUK: HUNGUND, BAGALICOT DISTRICT; RESPONDENTS TI-Il S WRIT 4PPEA L I; S I1. LE* D U ER Sf/CAl (2 N 4 C) F THE ITIRNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER OP LIE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE MADE IN WRIT Nos. 17156/2007 PETITION C/W. 117 74/2005; IKLR.RR/SURI DATED: DISMISS THE ABOVE WRIT PETITIONS. 2t/nQflCfl Iti,i :5: THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The order of the learned Single Judge dated 26th August 2009 passed in WP No.17156/2007 is called in question in this appeal. There is delay of 528 days in filing the appeal. An application is filed to condone the delay of 528 days. We have heard the learned advocate and the application ified for condonation of delay of 528 days. The application is supported by the affidavit of one Mahesh Karjagi, Tahsildar of Badami taluk. According to the application the order of the learned Single Judge was passed on 26.08.2009 and the result of the Writ Petition was intimated to the appellant from the office of the Advocate General on 31.08.2009 within 5 days from the date of order and it further reads that certified copy of the order was sent alongwith legal opinion on ’ a b o 0 a c D C . I ? 0 a D C g D C 0 D C 4 o o D C t a W 0 t 3 b a Z ° l f D 4C 0 D C a D C I W a t D C n n . 0 9 D C z < D C t D C a g o a o . a W 0 a ° D C a a o B B i “ 0 o r 1 p 0 D C a < D C C a 0 D C D C n j & 0 r 0 0 e 0 I - I o O O B D C r f t 0 < B 0 0 D C D C D C 1 D C D C D C i i L C . • D C c D C ‘ D C C D P D C D C t - ) C D C D C D C D C D C D C D C D C ) ) p g D C D C D C 3 5 M D C D C - A $ D C D C D C D C 3 $ ) : C < D C D D I 3 $ : D C D C D C D C C D D C D C D C D C : D C D C D C i ) D C D C D C P D C D C L C D C O C D C D C D C * r D C ) ) t C t r . D C D C 3 $ D C ) C D C _ ) D C D C t r ) l - d C D D C D C p t r ç n D C D C D C D C s D C i C ) ) r f 2 t C D C D C D C , + m D C D C L C D C ) C ) C 3 $ \ A _ r f * r D C n ! D C t D C ) C D C D C L C + r D C D C n e D C D C D C D C ) C ) d C D C ) C D C D C D C D C P D C 3 $ n e 3 — $ - n - e D C F r D C D C D C D C * r ) / ( D C D C D C D C D C r r L ) C D C D C * r d m D C m D C D C D A C + l f D C j m D C ) C D C p A r f e - r C D D C C D ) C D C 6 u Q D C D C D C D C . r f D C m D C D C D C D C D 6 L C L C L C m c ) C D C e L E 3 $ L C t 0 t c D C C j D C L C ) i C C D C D C t r D C D C l f P . g m c D C ’ r D C D C 3 $ D C ) m r D C ) C ) C D C t r 3 $ m - n e t D C D C C < P g I . m c D C C D D C m c D C * r 3 5 ) C D C ) C 3 5 5 n e D C 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ m c D C D C D C D C 3 5 D D C D C ) d C ‘ D C ) C D C 3 5 ) d C ) C D C L C C D D C 1 £ O D t r o g D C D C O D i t r D C D C 0 D C + r D C D c D C t d ‘ DR C D C D C D C 4 - t r D C o g t D C o c , 5 5 o 1o 0 I Q D 0C O D O D D C 4 - * r 1 0 D C i O S D O D O D ’ DF C e e p 1 4 - ‘ x l f r t f i L : a _ _ , . • ) ’ — F 0