SMT. MALLAWWA v. SRI. RAMANGOUDA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA AND REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100278 OF 2020 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. MALLAWWA W/O PANDAPPA PATIL AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT - 587313
2. SMT DODDAWWA MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench W/O RAMAPPA @ RAMANGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT- 587313
3. SRI. VISHNU S/O RAMAPPA @ RAMANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT -587313 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:187-DB RFA No. 100278 of 2020
4. SRI. VENKAPPA @ VENKANGOUDA S/O RAMAPPA @ RAMANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT-587313
5. SRI. HANAMANT S/O PANDAPPA PATIL AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT-587313
6. SMT. SATTEWWA W/O MOHANAPPA PATIL AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT-587313
7. SRI. SHIVANGOUDA S/O PANDAPPA PATIL AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O MALLAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT- 587313
8. SMT. MANJAWWA W/O ARJUN SANKRATTI AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O DODANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313 (BY SRI. S B HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE) …APPELLANTS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:187-DB RFA No. 100278 of 2020 AND:
SRI. RAMANGOUDA S/O VENKANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313
SMT. GOURAWWA W/O KRISHNAPPAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313
SMT. SHRIDEVI W/O BASAWARAJ SANKRATTI AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313, NOW AT POONA (MAHARASHTRA)
SRI. NARAYANGOUDA S/O KRISHNAPPAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313
SAVITA D/O KRISHNAPPAGOUDA PATIL AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313 - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:187-DB RFA No. 100278 of 2020
SRI. GOUDAPPA S/O VENKANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313
SRI. VASANTGOUDA S/O VENKANGOUDA PATIL AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: LAXANATTI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313 (R1, DECEASED, R3, R5 & R6 – Addressee Left, R4 – Unclaimed and R2 & R7 Served) …RESPONDENTS RFA FILED UNDER SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD.31.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.42/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:187-DB RFA No. 100278 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that dispute between the parties has been settled out of the Court. Hence, prays to dismiss the appeal as not pressed.
2. Memo is placed on record.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.1/2021 does not survive for consideration, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE BVK CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.