✦ Karnataka High Court · 25 Nov 2011

Judgment · High Court · 2011

13 min read

Judgment

1.

S II 45 .a S .4 • h b . V .. 4

15.

RABIA ASADALLI SAYYAD AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O SADAR BAZAR, CAMP: BELGAUM.

16.

FATIMA SAYYED, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RIO SADAR BAZAR, CAMP: BELGAUM.

17.

MAIMUNNISA ABDUL RAZAK TASILDAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RIO 301, AWATI GALLI, KILLA, GOKKAK, BELGAM DISTRICT.

18.

RAHAMTULLI CHANDSHAEB PATEL, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O KAWAT MANKAL, MAHARASHTRA.

19.

BIBIJAN SHAMSUDDIN KOWTEKAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RIO 301, AWATI GALU, KILLA. GONKAK, BELGAM DISTRICT.

20.

ZAHARABI ABDUL KAREEM MOMEEN. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RIO BELGAUM.

21.

KHATOONBI KUTUBUDDIN PEERZADE BELCIAUM,

22.

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RIO BELGAUM. ILIYAS KAZ1, AT POST KULIKATrI, BELGAUM DISTRICT.

(BY SRI.RAVI G.SABHAHIT. ADV. FOR Ri, R5-R8, R2, R3 AND R4 SERVED, SRI.MAHESH WODEYAR, AGA FOR R9, SRI.S.N.PARANDE, ADV. FOR RI 1. 14, 17 R19-R22, R13 SERVED. R15 S/H/S, R16 S/H/S. SRLS.B.NAIK, ADV. FOR RIS) RESPONDENTS ‘. It a. 7 D 0 3 4 > < 3 3 , 2 f i : 3 . < C 3 r > 0 ” 3 < 3 3 4 0 > 0 • 4 ; ” 3 4 - 3 - 7 ” 7 H 3 3 3 3 3 3 : 3 3 3 3 3 < : 3 4 . 2 “ ) K . 3 3 7 0 o D C 7 > ; 3 l 3 f . 3 < 0( < 2 < 2 3 3 4 U 4 0 — 3 3 3 3 4 0 3 3 3 - — 3 I D 4 ; > > ; i - ” r f < ’ e < * 7 > 0 C — 4 f i 4 D < < 2 0 7 2 7 . ) ) f i ] 3 O z 3 ) 3 3 3 3 o f i C 0 : 0 > ; < 3 ) C : 3 3 ) 3 ) C C < . ” 4 3 * 4 7 < ” ’ C C L : 4 ) > _ “ C C C ) i C . < 3 7 > ” m c “ — — 5 - D C — D C t r D C D C D C — D C ) ) 3 < 2 D C C ( ” 3 3 < D C f i ” 3 c ? U ‘ < f i D C D C : — - 3 < : 3 D C < 2 > ; m c n i 0 n i f i ) ) 3 ? U ‘ < D C f i 4 D C < > < 2 D C a ) 2 < 9 0 - < — l 9 : 3 3 a 3 3 — D C ) ” 3 : 0 . 0 N ” 3 ( ) ” 3 4 ? U C C 9 t — U a r — D C C C C C l C ( C D , — — < 2 — — C C D C : 3 “ — D C : — n i ( D C ( ” 3 ? U < D C D C ( < 2 ! o 4 D C ) l D C C ) — 7 ) 3 D C 9 2 ) ) 3 C D ) l C D C 3 D C . f — < ” D C D C — 9 — — D < C . f i $ C C : — D C D C D C 3 3 ) 2 ( D C ” 3 ‘ m c < 4 U L C D — D C S D C 4 - D C 4 ’ j ; — ) ) 3 C D — ) 3 ( 0 D C ) ) 3 — D C . : 3 3 ) 3 U a “ — ) c 3 f i . D C D C D C D C . 5 t r — < D C D C 3 4 m c D C ) l C 5 i D ” D C D C C D > D C D C D C D C D C s c - i L 3 f ‘ i ” 3 D C m c D C t r “ D C < 2 3 3 ) ) 3 ( D C 2 D C - D C ( D C D C > < 2 3 ) 3 D C ” 3 ) l C 3 ) 3 3 3 D C ” 3 3 3 : 3 D C C C ) ) I — D C f > i D C ) C D C 9 D C f i t - ) ) 3 ? U L < ‘ < D C “ • C D ) ) 3 ? U D C . . m c ‘ D C — 3 ) 3 m c 4 < 2 t r ” 3 D C < . ? U ? * 5 ’ l C ( C C 3 ) 3 D C ( — D C D C — L l i 5 ) 3 3 C C D C f i i t r < 7 D C ) - ‘ D C * r D C > — 3 t r ) l C ) ) 3 f i * — D C . . 2 D C C C . ) 3 D C < C C ’ a i C C ? U ç ” D — C a ” N D C i i 3 D C ) ) 3 — ? < — . ” D C D C 3 3 4 D C l C ( o C D 5 ’ 5 5 — D 3 , C D C ” 3 7 C C D C D C D C D C — D C s a D C 5 4 Q P ( a C D C . 3 — a D C C D < 2 1 o < 2 1 O D C C C D C ) ) C D C S ) 3 C C 9 - ( ” a D C > 7 C D . H ) l C D C 4 5 4 5 D C . I ( H * 4 D C 4 5 H - D C 4 = < 5 H D C H D C ( H D C D C H 1 ( H D C D C H D C D C 4 5 — D C ) l C 5 D C - D C D C D C - H D C < - 4 < D C H D C I ’ D C D D C Z 4 - D C D C C D — D C H = D C H i r H D C D C 5 C D D C D C D C 4 5 5 D C 4 5 4 - - 4 - D C D C H H - ‘ = D C H < - D C D C D C ’ 4 . ) l C H ) l ( C C ( S D C D C D C 4 5 5 S D 4 5 D4 C , 4 5 D C H D C ‘ < D C 2 4 5 D C D C C C * 4 H D C H D C D C H H . 5 H D C < — H D C - D C 5 ( D C D C ’ D - 4 C H D C < - H D C D C D C 5 H i ( D C H 4 ’ 4 < D C r H D C D C H D C 5 D C — H n D C 4 < . H H ) l C H 4 5 D C 4 ) < 4 5 ) C ( D C H H D C H D C 4 < D C H D C < 1 5 < H H . l E H D C D C D C 5 5 D C D C 4 5 H 4 r H D C 5 D C D C D C * 4 ’ r H D C H D C D C H - — H < D C 4 < = _ 4 D C D C 5 ( D C ) l C H ; . D C D C ) D C D C D C D C D D I H D C 5 r 5 — H H C D D C D C H 5 S E D C D C H H 4 5 ( D C D C D ’ t r D C D C = ) - D C < H D C D C o C r - 4 < H H D C D C H H 4 < D C D C 2 C D C C D D C — D C D C H D C D C = D C ) l C D C D C O D D C D C D C c D C D C D C D C 5 S 4 5 H H H H D C D C D C H j ( — H D C H 4 5 H D C 5 5 4 — 5 4 D C H H D C D C D C H D C D C H D C D C D C — D C D C H t r D C H4 = o D C D C H 4 5 H D C D C - - S V S E D C 1 ( — * 4 H D C D C D C ) D C D C S D C D C S D C C C D C D C D C D C D C D C D C H H D C H D D C ( D C < 5 n — 4 5 H ( D C ( D C ( D C j C 5 5 D C C D D C ( H H D C ( H D C D C E S D D H D C t r H D C H ( D * C D C D C — C D S E D C ) D C D C . < — D C 5 < r • • D C * 5 . D C ) D D C 5 . H D C D C * 4 * 4 D C D C D C ( H H D C : H C D C D C t r D C 4 5 ) D C D C D C H H 4 r D C * r - D C S D C C C D C S D C 5 4 5 D C D C H D C D C D C - 4 C D D C D C D C . a H H 5 D C D C r - 4 D C r * r D C . . 4 S E t r H D C H — H D C - 5 < — 5 D C D C D C . D C S . 5 D C - 4 D C ; D C * 4 H D C aaCC C CC D L DC C t r D CC D0 C C D L D C C D C D C i L e L C D C i lCe L E i L e D C D C i L e L C C C DCCCC D L e i L C D C L C l E L C i L e L C ’ 1 ’ 4 L C C 2 L C i L e D C D C D C : 9 . 4 — i i L L r L C ) C C j D C D C C i L e L C D C C I C L C D C E L e L e i L C L DC C CC t r C l E L C L C D C L C C D C DC C D C C D C L C L C C L C L C D C C— 9 4 ) I C i L e < D C D C C C L C L C D C * e 0 L C i L e L C D C C D C L C L C L C C C $ I C L C L C D C D C - C L C D C 1 5 C D C D C P C L C L C D C , D C — C C L C ) C D C D C 5 L C i L 0 D C a D C D C 0 D C i 5 5 C L e ) C D C 0 C j D C D C D C — D C C C C D C 9 L C C C D C D C S C L C L C L C C D D C D C D C C Q • l E C L C L C : ç D C D C ) : C D C i C o CC D L e D C L C C I D C D C i L e 0 t r D C i C L e D C = C0 C CC C D . I C D C D C i L e L C D C — D C i L e 0 D C — C C D C I F L C 5 5 L C C I Lo C D C ) Lo 4 C ÷ r L C D C i L L C DC C L C 4 4 i - r 4 _ 4 ! L L D $ . >4 D G i _ C i i - k i _ P ) C C , l r a C . . , i — t 4 L C - — ) C C C i L C I L C 5 5 C C

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments