MARUTHI GOWDA R v. THE STATE BY S.P., UTTARA KANNADA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- M G UMA
Outcome
Withdrawn
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. NAVEENA D GAWANKARA KARAWARA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT -581301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W CRIMINAL PETITION UNDER SECTION 528 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023…
Judgment
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7111 WP No. 102836 of 2025 …PETITIONERS HADAGALI TOWN, VIJAYANAGAR-583219.
7. S.G. MANJUNATHA S/O. S. GANIBASAPPA, R/AT.NO.101, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE UPANAYAKANAHALLI, ANKASAMUDRA, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, BELLARY-563212. (BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE STATE BY S.P., UTTARA KANNADA, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, DHARWAD-580011.
THE STATE BY P.S.I. KARWAR, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, DHARWAD-580011.
MAKABOOLA, KARAWARA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581301.
TABAREJA, KARAWARA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT -581301.
Operative part
NAVEENA D GAWANKARA KARAWARA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT -581301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W CRIMINAL PETITION UNDER SECTION 528 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 POLICE TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 UPON THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONERS THROUGH THEIR AUTHORIZED PERSON DATED 11-11- 2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G, AND THE PETITIONERS PRAY FOR PASSING OF SUCH OTHER RELIEF OR ORDER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7111 WP No. 102836 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE CT UMD List No.: 3 Sl No.: 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.