Judgment · High Court · 2011
Judgment
1. • r .1 .1. .‘.‘“
I. . !.:\.‘e’ ;If ‘ ••‘‘k’’S i4)I)% I •. & . .‘ i ‘ • . ‘S. • ‘ .•‘ ‘.‘ — ‘‘‘ .4 Iji II 1)1 I’• 4 IT ‘.‘.NV. ‘‘I’ Ic)I •.‘!S,: ••; L’1. : \ ••.•‘ , . i,• ,I1 •‘S,‘jiN)I.(ji I’Ij ‘.‘tn•\i’.’\ii\\jt’i \IT Id“fl IOi I)’)’ .‘t•. ‘1. • . S i’iT2II S••• •• •Jif ••, H ). ••i I •• )% t .1‘ ‘‘•‘: •( ..‘Ji 1’ I !!.‘- ‘. II I • ... I ( I , 4 3%‘ ‘ ‘ .‘‘ . ‘I .. ‘,‘‘ ‘ ‘..:_‘) \IC t I • I 1 ‘ Jad) l’14l ‘NNOI‘tIV‘ftS” Kh’CI\HS?RII LI) t4(’4‘fldSi’!().iIS’iI-I’cI\ ; tN S>I?1fl4\(1’‘N1TI3IVWsHSIi\5“èlNOdThn:4] (N%OSNId‘1‘LèfldÔN ‘)flS>k13fldsIC1(IhkD03(111-Vd IOLN tfl. Ts1..\ 1ISINis •n‘‘• I :, I I_N1(t) Is•‘c:•i’iI\r\Si—IL Ifl ‘VtIk’Veb (PlsSkd N1 liflhll è13C1I() OOts(Yacuvciinn0rcnro\ 1HJ jfIJ.4() I.Iefl\ ‘4\:V’’I‘ I(1I- flUIJ:‘ III )\II\O)1cI1d\ ‘Iti\WVk-.\‘‘ “ I
9.-ia 7!.! S.C )J ‘r.‘)If:: •L•f ‘)j( III ‘ ;‘ I 0 1• i C ; C D C D C — C ( H C C ( ( I 3 . H C ( : C ( - 0 C ( ( C ( a . — — . C ( H — ) C D C D a C D C - — D C a H • C ( . L C - C C C ) — C ( - a — — C ( a - ) C ( a C C C ( H D C H - — i — C ( a D a C D C D C ( D C — - a C ( C ( . . 3 . D C . , . H C ( a . C ( C ( . H i i . — — H - D C H C ( a — D C ( H . C C C a _ i C C ( ) C — C C ( — H C ( - — ) i ) C C C o C ( — i C — . D C D C H C ( i D C C ) C ‘ “ . H — C ( C C ( ( H C ( C ( — H — H D C — D C C ( i C 0 - . C . . ( 3 ( H - C ( 3 C ( — — C ( — 3 ( 3 i C — D C H i C . — 3 H D C ) C C — . C ( H ) C C j — — C ( - % 3 — — H H C ( H — — H * D C D C C C C C ( . — C C ( ( C ( C ( ( . . h — i C i C H * ) H H C ( C ( “ a ) . C C C — - C C C ( ( 3 — C C ( 0 i ; C ( C ( ) C - — - C ( ) C D C ) C ( C ( C ( ( C - — D C C ( . H H C C o H C ( C — D C ( 3 C ( H . C ( . C ( ) C ( C C ( C ( — H — - C ( 3 D C C H ( C ( 3 C : C ( H C ( i C C ( * H — ) C — C C H C C C a — : * i C C ( 3 C ( “ ‘ : i C ( C — C ( a : C ( D C D C — C ( “ C ( . w a C C C ( ( ( D C . D C H a “ N ( C - ( D C . , C ( - C ( C C C 3 H 0 C C C E D C ) C C ( 3 C C ( ( “ — : 3 ‘ ) _ j D C C ( L C C ( , C C — ‘ ( - D C i C C ( - ) C C C — a D C — . — — C C ( D C : - C C C ( ( ( L C , - - . H C ( C a ( ) C . C ( — H ‘ D C C ( H 0 H D C ‘ : D C — 3 3 ‘ a a C ( . - “ - + r C ( C ( , , C D C C C i i a C D C . . C ( C ( . C ( . H i - - a ” 3 . . , ’ 0 — D C 3 C ; ’ - ( C D C - , . - a C ( D C H C ( - . C ( — , o L C Q . j f C ( . C ( ) C ( - : - a a ‘ ) 3 ( D C * “ . C ( D C D C - a 0 , , , H — C ( “ ‘ . , - . : H C ( — ) C . D C H C C ( ( “ - - a C ( - a a C ( I t C 0 C ( i C
D C ) C j C C ( C ( C C — C C . ) f : ) ) C ) : j - ) C . . ) C ) C ) C ) C C ) C ) C ) . a C C ) JaC - ) ) ) C C C a ‘ . ) C ) ) C ’ ) : ) C C ) C ) C ) C 9 ) C ) 9 ) a C H ) ) i L : ) ) Ha C ) ) C ) C , — 9 — - — ) ) f i ) C C < ) a C a ) ) C C m m - : 2 ’ C ) ) < 5 . ) C — a P m m a . ) C ) C ) ) 5 _ a . : ) C ) C ‘ • m m
) C C C C C C a C < ) ) ) C C C a ) C ) C < . 1 ) - ) C p a ) ) C > C < ) C < ) C : a ) 2 ) C ) C : ) C ’ ) C < a C < • S P 0 a . D P ) C — L C iUC ) C < ’ C ) C ) ) C ) ) C C ) , C ) ) C ) aC C ) D P ) C C C ) C ) C 5 — ) aC ) C i ) C H ) ) C C H . o ) C - ) C ) C - : ) C ) C H • . ) C : r ) _ ) C ) C : ) C ) C m m ) C ) C ) )a C ) C i - - a . i ) C L ) C . ) C i L p — a ) C a ’9 S P ) C ) ) C C ” C 2 : 4 < t ) C H - i D ) C j _ : ) C ) C ) ) C ) C — ) C < : ) C ) — C C < ) ) ) C C C : ) C — - : ) C t - ) _ ) ? 2 C : ) C ) C ) C . > . ) C a ) C ) C : ) C ; c H ) C m m ) C > ) C ) , ) ) C C C ) C C . ) C rH ) ) C C ) C ) ) C C + r - a : ) C ) a C < — ) C ) 5C — > C H ) ) C ) ) C c HC ) ) C ) C )a C C ) m C c )aaC ) ) C ) a C C ) ) C )a C C ) 4 - ‘ 4 — ‘ ) ) C a C ) ) C < C )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.