✦ Karnataka High Court

SRI K. VEERAPPA v. SRI K. NAGARAJ

Criminal Revision Petition No. 100086 of 2025V SRISHANANDA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
V SRISHANANDA

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100086 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI K. VEERAPPA S/O. K. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST AND COMMISSION AGENT IN M/S. SRI BOGADI BASAVESHWARA TRADERS, R/O. BALAYA NILAYA, KAPPAGAL ROAD, OPPOSITE TO 7TH CROSS, BALLARI-583103. CELL: [REDACTED]. (BY SRI Y. KOTRESHA, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER SRI K. NAGARAJ S/O. VENKATESH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF SRI LAKSHMI FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIES, OPPOSITE TO MAREMMA CIRCLE, OLD BUS STAND GANDHI STATUE, MOKA VILLAGE-583117, BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. (SECTION 438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS) SEEKING CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS AND ALLOW THIS PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 03.03.2025 IN CRL.APPEAL NO. 04/2025 PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-CUM COMMERCIAL COURT, BALLARI AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDERS OF SENTENCE OF CONVICTION PASSED BY LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT-BALLARI IN C.C.NO. 611/2023 DATED 13.01.2025 THEREBY CONFIRM THE SENTENCE OF CONVICTION JUDGMENT AND ORDER AGAINST THE RESPONDENT-ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC 138 OF NI ACT BY IMPOSING SENTENCE TO PAY FINE OF RS.20,15,000/- FURTHER WITH DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE HE SHALL UNDERGO SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT OF 6 MONTHS. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER 12:20:17 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5876 CRL.RP No.

100086 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo with withdrawal on 01.04.2025. Memo reads as under:

The counsel for the petitioner submits as under: The above said petitioner filed case against the challenging the judgment and orders passed by the learned Hon’ble IVth Addl. District and Sessions Judge cum commercial Court Ballari in Crl.A.No.4/2025 dated 03.03.2025. The petitioner intending to withdrawal the above petition due to erroneous or typical mistake mentioned in the petition. Hence the above said petitioner withdrawal the petition, the Hon’ble Court may be please to withdrawal the above petition to liberty for filing fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity. Hence, the memo.

Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed for non prosecution with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 10

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision Petition No. 100086 of 2025). ← Search more judgments