STATE OF IRNATAKA v. DILEEPL: DILEEPKUMAR CHID AND BUTLI
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Precedent status
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
Original judgment text
Sessions Judge are not at all challenged h: thr learned ,‘ 4t’’ I P 1 r 1 p c vn ar:ciu nns’de”e t ‘V itei in p rn cc a o o c(ata’r’r in tni’ nape l a s cc t u) p see tIOfl nas prov d t at tH accused as cornmttea an ctfnncp nun’ahIe i S C a o igm1 ect C4ar*,ar B X a * 1 0 ( D C P O ‘ o ) 2 ’ - I S ‘ p 4 ‘ $ ‘ 8 4 ‘ . S I 0 D C 8 B . S I I q o e c ’ 0 B m D C E4 S B g . % 4 D C . S I o t B D C . 0 . 2 P ‘ ’ 3 L D C t - . S o I t ‘ ! D C . S I 0 ( ‘ ° D C j c ! m * 0 0 D C ) 2 4 I • I • n N o & 0 ( D C ’ D 0 ( D C • ‘ D C ’ - I a i £ . A a b t e e • I o s t C4 0 0 C C C )C4 0 ( aC4 v 4C aCaa C t r C 4 - o C r Z a t r Z a rC Z C 9 2 C a 4 - 4 . a 0 C : : 9 0 0 t ’ r 4 4 C t r C4 a C p a v C a 2 * 0 0 ’ - 4 - 4 4 L 4Z • = C a v C C C v C 2 0 o r t a C v C a - C 4 C ‘ v C n r < 2 0 - 4 C D t r C r Z C t 0r S U Ca C ( 2 6 r CZ C C r Z a O D t + r C v C v t r a r CZ 0 C = a t r v C a r Z a Q C v C ; a a C 2 0 t r 9 a * v 0 C v C - 4 C t r r Z a i v a O C 0 a C 2 0 a r r t r : ; t r Z a t r 1 ! a a C 2 0 a i v v o t — r Z + r 2 0 - v 4 c - 0 a C DC ± r < t r a c C a a C O D D C v C - - a C r Z • a 4 a 4 i v r v aC C Cc m — v i v C a + r v C v c t r a C a * r 0 a a C 2 0 a F E Z J t 0 a r a t Ca t 2 Cr a0 2 ’ 0 C r Z t r a i v a C a n 0 c v CC C C4 a a oC o t o t r a t Cr t C t : CzoCC v C - c C a a ; s a Ca a 0 ? F a r Z j - ! 2 * ( a a C : 9 — t r r Z = i v 9 a C t r > v C o i i r Z r Z C r Z a i v a j v I C a 1 C I a E ± r C a 2 6 ( 0 ( t r a a 3 5 v C a a a : 9 a v C 0 a * 6 0 C 9 0 1 v C - 0 0 r Z C a r Z C a9 a r Z 3 f ( t r 0 a o t $ : 9 t C C I v 0 C C < a i v 0 ( - 0 4 C t r r Z a 2 6 ( C a v C v C • a + r t r - < 4 • - 9 C a 9 v C C : : 9 . . a C . . r C ’ i ( t r ” a - i v C t r ° g : 9 : a 5 ( o t t r r Z a 3 6 ( C 2 ) 1 ( 0 - y m s C v C . i v ( C i v i v 3 5 ( : 9 a . i v a v C t r r Z a C 2 6 ( a . 5 ( C a - 4 C : 9 i v C v C : 9 o o t a : - I 0 C 9 : a 9 o c z E C i Q — ) 3 $ l C D C ) 3 $ l E r E , t ’ t C 9 4 5 $ D C D C o ( • ! D C l ) ) C t 1 > t r 0 4 > 4 5 4 > 0 l C a L t , p 6 4 < n 4 < 4 4 > t D C 3 — 4 > 5 0 ) 3 $ D C l C 1 L 0 L C < 4 > 5 4 < D C 3 $ D C D C 0 r i • l D C C i r > < 3 3 ) . 9 4 4 0 4 r f D C 4 > D C . . . L i D C D C 4 > o c D C . 1 6 D C 0 n D C I 1 3 4 < o t 0 D C D C L C . 3 4 > 5 3 0 D C 0 4 > D C - Q D C 0 t 4 > 4 > D C ‘ t r 3 $ D C 3 ( 4 ) C 0 i L 0 l F 4 > 0 3 < 4 < 5 . < 3 ( z z 4 > 5 < ‘ l C L C i 4 < 9 D C L r > * e ) 3 $ Q t r D C 0 3 < D C l C . - 2 5 5 0 4 < 4 3 $ D C — D C D C D C 4 < 4 > 4 C k 0 D C p i L 1 3 $ 1 3 $ 4 > 0 4 < 0 o D C , 0 e D C t r D C 5 ( 4 k - r f 0 D C o t D C 0 D C D C r E 4 < 4 > 4 < D C D C D C 5 5 D C D C 4 > T C D C ) 3 $ — 1 6 — D C , C n e D C 4 > < T i D C D C D C 3 < • l f + r 4 > a d D C 0 4 < ( D C 4 < 4 4 < L C 4 < 1 1 ) 3 3 l 0 C . 1 1 g - > 4 < y4 4 3 < $ 0 0 0 0 D C 0 0 i D C L l E 1 3 1 0 1 6 6 0 6 4 > i E L C L L * i r ? i i 0 C : 0 0 l 0 C T i D C > L C n e t 4 > D C 4 > ‘ D C % Q 5 3 $ 4 > L 4 > 4 3 > ) ) C - n e 4 > 5 D C L C D C ° 3 2 o L C t C ‘ 4 > 4 > L C t D C h 0t l C : l C 0 t < a 0 1 > > • t i : e e Z — 0 t D C m D C 4 > l C 2 l C :9:
11. The learned Sessions Judge having rightly appreciated the material evidence placed before the Court, it do not require interference at our hands. There is no merit in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Sd! JUDGE JUDGE RKK/