High Court · 2011

circumstances. the trial Court is also justified in holding that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. However, from the material on record, more particularly the evidence of P.Ws.5, 11 and 12, we find that there is a prima facie case under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. But charge is not framed for the offence under Section 306 of IPC. The charge is under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial Court has not taken pains to see as to whether the case falls at least under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code or not. C — ) C ) ) C C D C 9 3 2 0 ) ) ) C C C 0 1 r - 0 I 7 . 2 2 — a ) ) % 1 — 0 9 1 F 0 F — I ’ r c ) C 4 7 D C - C ) C 2 1 D C 2 l 1 C r c — — ) C D C ) C D C D C I ) 3 ) C ) C i C ) C D C ) C l C . ‘ 7 2 7 D C D C D C ) a C ) C ) ) l C 2 - ) C — l C 3 2 - ) ) C C 1 F 7 3 ‘ ‘ r D C 2 ) ) C C 7 D C 7 — ) C • F x c - 3 2 ) C % 5 4 * $ 3 2 ’ 2 ” a 3 2 . 2 o ) C 3 D C , 2 7 3 2 ) C 3 2 0 H 2 . a — i C D C 0 ) C D C ) C 7 1 2 $ 7 — I - ) ) — 0 2 — I 3 2 D C ) C ) C D C o — ) ) C C — 4 1 ) C l C ’ 7 P 7 r ) ) C C 9 2 C — D C ) C 2 ) C C ) ) l C D C . ‘ . 0 3 2 2 “ ‘ C ’ ) C ‘ ’ r D C 7 ) C 9 - D C 0 D C i - 2 2 — 0 . — ) C ) C $ 3 2 ) C ) C — 9 D C 3 2 * 0 r 7 D C - 2 2 7 2 7 D C 2 2 ) C ‘ 2 . - I ) 3 0 D C ) C — 2 I Q 1 C - : 7 — 2 ) C l C D C - 7 — a - - D C 9 1 D C - D C I 7 ) C . — D C 2 3 2 - — D C D C 3 3 2 D C H I ) C F “ S . I ) ) C C ) 3 ) C D C , C D C ) C 0 2 3 - 3 2 2 2 — 9 — 7 ) C — i C ) C H — — 7 - 0 — D C 7 ) l C 2 R 7 ) C r 2 2 a F ) C - D C I ) C 2 2 2 ) C 7 7 3 ) C 9 C 7 N — — ) C - 7 D C ) C H 1 ) ) l C 2 - D C 3 2 a 2 D C 3 ) C l C D C ) C i j ( 7 — ‘ D C l C . 2 . ) C 3 7 2 3 2 0 1 7 ) 7 C ) , 7 C ) C 7 . ( $ — 3 2 0 D C ‘ “ - 1 3 ) 3 . ) ) C C — l C 0 3 2 ) C 5 F 1 ’ ) C D C D C 7 D C — — - I ) C H < 7 D C ) C F 2 — i ) ) 1 1 3 2 4 I 0 - 2 i C 3 2 ) C 2 ) C 4 4 - ) C — - 9 D C ) C 3 ) 3 D C — ) 3 2 a * - F l C 9 C ) 1 ) C D C 2 ) C 2 I ) C 2 F — ) C ) ) C C 2 ‘ ’ 7 a a - ) C . — ) 3 F S O F — S I l C ) C t r ) C 7 ‘ ii. b tJc tria C nt w’ w flu malt. i haq in lx n rnittcd in ihit. (‘i’urt bc Iu’ f,q fiaiiiing thr ltarize undc r Sectivni JOr of’I ml tnPcrilC.jd “ t I t” ‘list tics irhvr rnatt rial ‘‘n nlrr’zs. at ‘his staLZe. ft ‘tt. disc usc the matter in dctail flu offc ni c under • Sernon ,Qn ol tile lflfllafl 1 I • I I flLU ( ‘‘(it’. Tnt sante iiin I 1 ‘ 1 prejudu e cither of thc paflic Ha ing regard to thc tarts and , in ‘lmstanc’es. in ‘n;r considen-.! opiflnfl. jusnu ould be met. I the ni I Court is directed to frame the charge under Sectioti 30, ot tile Indian Ptnal C c de 1 ‘e l)jt •.4lL’ •Ii i1:. t’f p ‘e %It t ,‘ ‘‘.ilt! ‘e h pu f i H ‘1St inC ‘I, t( ‘( I•i p. t r1. r.”gig, . r’ C’ flu t .11(1.9 : IC r q ‘I •1. Ip a T’ .‘ :. •t 1:1....,’ t. £r ,c •t t U f’t Ii L ç r .. b . . . S - I • 3 :.“ i• . - ( V 1’ qg qsc If. thc tluab1t. time of the Cm ‘st ni aid ‘d C bt-c’n :%r.td. Sn (‘0111(1 luVt’ SJt’tl ewbtrnssmc ‘tot th ic’’ C’ ‘ ‘(j)C iitll a It’ t rj, Ri ih€n as it m€n since jaisnec’ is to he done and a just conclusion is to be reached based on tilt imiteti.ti on recoa d the onh option left is to n mit the in itter i’ith a direction to ttw (“art hem’ in ft-Lisp,- the harge under Section 306 of thc Indian Penal Code

6. It is made clear that the jttdgmeiit and ordea of a qiuttil passed in thy trial Cou’t in o far as the nitente undri Sr’ flc in (fl ‘‘I ‘he-’ Iptj in Pet; 4 t o’la - d ? 1d a t t ‘c rI 5r • ir J i’c,5’; I ‘Itli ( ‘rc — • t’fl’fl :‘ S’ ?i:’ •i)( I L ‘ ‘ £ Ii I u t 8j ‘r •tt • • —;. “Isv I j• ‘ii • ,, ,t I n ‘1 • • t • • • 1- I I. D G D G D C D G D C a D C 2 C a o D G - • t r D G D C D G D G D G D G D C D G — — Da C > D C J 2 - D C D G a o C - D C a D C aG D ‘ ? D G 0 D G aC D D G 0 D C ? C t r 4 D G D G 5 a D C t r a D C 0 I z t : aC D D0G C Da G D 3 ( t aC D r D G D C D C D — C D 0 C G - D9 S G D4 : . H a D C D G a _ t 2 ( D C D G D G 2 0 D G a D C D G 0 — r — D G D G D G D G D C D L t ( a a D C 2 D D C ) C D G D G — D G r a D C 3 D C 0 D G D C D C D - G D G a D C D C ) e C , — ) D G o a D C — a t - D C — D G . ’ - G F 2 D C a e e r a - D C D C a D C — D C . < D C 1 a D C 2 a a S g 2 D G a a D C D G - D G D C 2 D G ‘ a D G — D G a D C g — D G c C 4 D C a . 4 4 D C D G a J - C C D G r E 2 D G a D G D G D C C o a D C 2 — D G D C D G D G D G o r E D G D G D G D G D C 2 2 2 a D C 0 D G D C D C D G D G D C F — e m 4 — D G 2 a D G D C D G a D G m e D G D C D C ) C D G 2 0 ? C 0 ( 4 N O 4 m e a D G D G a 2 4 C - r D G D C 2 m e D G — D C a D G ) C D G a D C D G a D C D C D G ) ( m e a a 0 i m e D G a D C — D G - 9 — 4 e D C D G D G 2 H a D C a D C D G D G D C D G ( D G a D C D C . ) c C 0 N C D G D G H . - D G D G a a 2 4 — D C E E H D ‘ G D G C - D C D G — D G a D C - a D C D G - . — m C D C D G 5 D C a D G D G e y e . - . H a D C t r D G — 9 — D G D G . 2 e m D C a ( . ‘ D G D G J D G D G t r D G 2 5 2 2 D G D G a D C ) C D G D G D G m e D G D C D G ) K D G D G D C D C a a D C - 2 4 ) D G ; o D G D G D C D G a D C D G a D C D C 2 D G D G o D G ( ? C P D G O 2 N a N O ‘ — D G ( 2 o a D G a i c D G D G D G D C C — 14: The observations made in the judgment shall not influence the trial Court. Since the matter is of the year 2006, the trial Court is directed to rehear and decide the matter in accordance with law as early as possible and not later than the period of six months from the date of this order. a. JUDGE Sd!- JUDGE I I I bvv/ Rsh