✦ Karnataka High Court · 19 Oct 2011

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWICRT. C, CENTRAL OFFICE, GOIKUL ROAD. HUFLI, RERBY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER v. SMTMANG.ALA \V.’OPARAPPA NUCHH1

Case Details Karnataka High Court · 19 Oct 2011
Court
Karnataka High Court
Decided
19 Oct 2011
Bench
—
Length
1,350 words

Summary

A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.

Precedent status

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

Original judgment text

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT B EN C H AT D HARWAD DATE..DD. THIS THE.. 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2011 BEFORE. THE HON’BLE MR SJLJSTICE BALNAOARATHNA MQia32OO7flV APPELLANT BETWEEN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWICRT. C, CENTRAL OFFICE, GOIKUL ROAD. HUFLI, RERBY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, (B... UT WRONGLY SHOWN AS REP. BY THE DIVISIONA.L CONTROLLER, NWiCRTC. BELGAUM IN THE CAUSE TITLE.; BEFORE MACTI (BY SRi F. S. DABA Li, ADVOCATE) AND: 1,, 2,

3., 4 SMTMANG.ALA \V.’OPARAPPA NUCHH1, i\QP. 4(3 YEARS. 0CC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, K UMARI NANDA D/OPARAPPA NUCHHI, AGE 14 YEARS, 0CC: STUDENT, KUMAR GANAPATHI S/O. PARAPPA NUCCHI, AGE 1.2 YEARS. 0CC: STUDENT, KU MAR BASAVARAL 5/0, SARA PPA NLICL1Hi, AGE 10 YEARS, 0CC: STUDENT, THE RESPONDETN NOS,2 TO 4 ARE MINORS B mT4Er NAT’ RAL 4)THE5 ‘‘‘‘ ‘N — p?:LSPtDJ’JDE.NT No.1 A.LL THE RESPOt DENTS ARE P./O. LAXMI NAGAR, BANAHATFI, TALUR. JAMARHANDI, DIST.:BACALKOT. Ci5’YSKi.HiVI31iSi—{ Th,WIAJ.’.JUT AL2U. P2)I2 K?KSIPOAJDEN1T5 IHIS MPA IS FiLED I. NDER SECTION 1 73t11 J M\ NcT AGAINST fOE •JCLXMENT ND N\V\RL) DATED 03H2 200 NSSF D IN M\ C NO 1 3 LII I OF MEMBI R MAC F F. ()MPENM1TO\ (E Es NJTJON TIlL )FP()i ON THI ‘FMAKII\NDI. AWR1)ING N ‘5( \\iih INTl h1ESi F L?( iE. 00 THIS \PPE\L COMING ON FOR ADMISSION TillS DAF. THE cUtRf DELIVERED TIlL FOLLOWING JUDGMENT Phis ippeil s filed by th N.W K ETC ssaihng the judgmnnt and a\\ald dated 03 02 p002, passd in M\ C No 156, 2005 b the M’\CT at Jarnakhancli. lEe icictant fac s f the case dC that C LA 01 2005 Ofl Mtllcipp w hi ‘t as proceeding r w aids bo tnd canteen at Banah:itt, Jinag tvfth his sonLn Ian to oat e h21strariun Nc4 k-F 23 21 rnIn }yr djr5) :10 ; t 0 0 •gI dO5 C a 1 01’l I (C i I o:- nn N Earn rn Nan nk1rte 01n C f 1 1 i ‘ C4 p . it N I 1 a A D C * - D C r ) ) C C D C ) ) C i c c i c - ) C c D C - i C 2 D C I t - f C 3 1 I - C • l i c _ I - C - ) * ) C i i D C i c D C ,I C * r D C - - c c i c c l C r C D C - ì a * D C * - D C I _ r 3 0 0 D C - D C - D C c c D C 3 ( c c * - i c * 1 i c D C + - D C c c c 31c r C I D D C I D ) C i c c 3 - N c c r o i c I D D C r C ) C ) C t - c c * o i c c c * I D r C c c c i c D C i* c g r f D C 3 1 ) C c 3 r 1 - 1 c c Q - D C D C C D C I I D D D C ) i c i c D 3 C D C 2 ) i D C 3 i *c D C 3 I /D D C c c c 3 * c i ) i c 3 i c D C D C I 3 D C + I D * 3 i c C ( c C0c i 1c i c - 3 ( )1c c c i i 2c 1 ( 2 1 2 “ i c iIC c D 0 r t 2 I 1 ( 2 / ( i I 2 1 i c t C ‘ S ( — I 1I‘ S t 2 ‘ 3 ( r I I ‘ I — t S ’ 1 L C 2 ‘ i c * 2 ‘ ) 1 ) i c 2 1 1 ‘ D C 0 I * C i c i c i c 2 1 2 ‘ ( 2 / ( c c 0 2 1 I 2 1 1 : i c D C j r C 0 2 1 c I I 2 / ( i c 1 ‘ D 3 ( - 3 i c c ‘ t S 2 — e i c 0 i i c 0 i c i i c C _ J c 2 1 ( i - i c i i i c 3 ( i i c * 2I ( 2 1 i c i c — i i c i c 3 ( — ) i c f 2 ( i i c , C - 2 ( 2 ‘ ( 0 i c 2 / ( i c 2 : i c c i c 2 1 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 ( 2 1 )— 2 1 ( j ; ( ( t S ‘ ) I - 2 ‘ t S - i c ) I r 2 ‘ o 2 z i I 2 ‘ i c I - - ; I — i c ; J J N 2 1 I 2 ‘ I i c * i c 2 1 ) i c r I ‘ - 2 1 2 ‘ - 3 3‘ 2 ’ 1 2 ‘ 2 ‘ c c 2 ‘ i c D C D C ) C I ‘ ( . a . z C 5 : 3 0 3 C D i c p 4 - D C r o i i I ( I ( i k D0 C 1 1 ( 3 0 k O 3 0 . 3 0 3 0 - 3 3 1 1 1 1 D C D 0 C ) i c 4 - C i Cc S i c 0 0 3 0 5 3 0 i c 3 0 0 0 3 0 i c - ’ i c . a 3 3 D C 5 : 2 / 1 )2 i c 0 3 3 5 : D C ) l . a I ‘ ( c c . D C 5 3 0 D C 3 3 D C j - 4 - 3 3 0 3 0 ( 1 i c ) C I I I ) 1 ) i c 1 D C . a 4 - 0 3 3 g - ) i c i c CC 4 - 3 P 0 5 : 5 : 0 5 : 5 o D C c j J ) 1 3 : . — a 0 * r o 0 c 0 0 ) i Dc C f I D C D C 0 ( - D C 3 1 ) 0 + r o k 1 4 0 ) i c ) 1 ( — 0 i c - 3 — 4 j t D C D C 3 0 3 D C 5 0 4 5 - : - s 0 k j z o i c C i c ( 1 : ÷ - 2 / 1 ) i c D C i k ) 5C 0 5 : J - D r o D C 3 0 ; 3 0 I + i c * r o 0 : 3 P D C 3 - J ; i 0c 0 0 , 0 , 9 0 0 0I 0 t 0 c 0 0 0 a a .C 3 1 r 0 B 0 9 D C ) b 0 . I I a v s mC - 0 c r t • r P g - a a , a c S t - a 0 0 . 2 9 ’ A W ‘ 0 d — , a a 3 i o W

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments