SRI. CHANDRAKANTH S GUDIMKANI v. HIGH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 s. 7(a)(A)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA BEFORE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101029 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1. SRI. CHANDRAKANTH S GUDIMKANI S/O LATE SHIVARAM C.GUDIMANI AGE. 53 YEARS WORKING AS. OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE BALLARI-583101 R/AT.OPP. BHARATKUMAR NURSING HOME, OPP.PRINCIPAL HOUSE DREAM WORLD SCHOOL, KAPPAGAL ROAD, BALLARY. (BY SRI. J M ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND: Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA PSI, LOKAYUKATHA POLICE STATION BALLARI REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
SRI. H UMESH S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. SKB TRAVELS OWNER, R/AT. SIRUGUPPA ROAD, HAVAMBHAVI, ASHOKNAGAR, BALLARI. (BY SRI. ASHOK.T.KATTIMANI., AGA FOR R-1; SRI. S.B.DODDAGOUDAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5752 CRL.P No. 101029 of 2024 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN BALLARI LOKAYUKTHA POLICE STATION IN CRIME NO.07/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 7(a) (A) OF P.C. ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BALLARI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for the respondent - State. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated
Operative part
28.03.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (N.S.SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PKS List No.: 19 Sl No.: 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — s. 7(a)(A).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.